Literature DB >> 23996098

Classifications in brief: Paprosky classification of acetabular bone loss.

Jessica J M Telleria1, Albert O Gee.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2013        PMID： 23996098      PMCID： PMC3792247          DOI： 10.1007/s11999-013-3264-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN： 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


× No keyword cloud information.
  19 in total

1.  Classification and an algorithmic approach to the reconstruction of femoral deficiency in revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Craig J Della Valle; Wayne G Paprosky
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Periprosthetic bone loss of the acetabulum. Classification and management.

Authors:  J A D'Antonio
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 2.472

3.  Validity and reliability of the Paprosky acetabular defect classification.

Authors:  Raymond Yu; Jochen G Hofstaetter; Thomas Sullivan; Kerry Costi; Donald W Howie; Lucian B Solomon
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-02-15       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Results of cementless revision for failed cemented total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  C A Engh; A H Glassman; W L Griffin; J G Mayer
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Acetabular defect classification and surgical reconstruction in revision arthroplasty. A 6-year follow-up evaluation.

Authors:  W G Paprosky; P G Perona; J M Lawrence
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 4.757

6.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data.

Authors:  J R Landis; G G Koch
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Reliability of acetabular bone defect classification systems in revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  D G Campbell; D S Garbuz; B A Masri; C P Duncan
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.757

8.  A comparison of the reliability and validity of bone stock loss classification systems used for revision hip surgery.

Authors:  Charles Gozzard; Ashley Blom; A Taylor; Evert Smith; Ian Learmonth
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.757

9.  Revision total hip arthroplasty with titanium ingrowth prosthesis and bone grafting for failed cemented femoral component loosening.

Authors:  R B Gustilo; H S Pasternak
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 10.  Bone grafts in hip replacement surgery. The pelvic side.

Authors:  A E Gross; D G Allan; M Catre; D S Garbuz; I Stockley
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 2.472
View more
  22 in total

Review 1.  Acetabular defect classification in times of 3D imaging and patient-specific treatment protocols.

Authors:  K Horas; J Arnholdt; A F Steinert; M Hoberg; M Rudert; B M Holzapfel
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  An alternative treatment option for Paprosky Type IIIb acetabular defect using multiple tantalum wedges - A case report.

Authors:  Markus Rossmann; Christian Ansorge; Christian Lausmann; Eduardo M Suero; Thorsten Gehrke; Mustafa Citak
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2018-10-25

3.  Reliability and Validity of Acetabular and Femoral Bone Loss Classification Systems in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Alex Gu; Marco Adriani; Michael-Alexander Malahias; Safa C Fassihi; Allina A Nocon; Mathias P Bostrom; Peter K Sculco
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2020-06-18

4.  Advanced quantitative 3D imaging improves the reliability of the classification of acetabular defects.

Authors:  Alexander Meynen; Georges Vles; Mark Roussot; Anthony Van Eemeren; Hazem Wafa; Michiel Mulier; Lennart Scheys
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 3.067

5.  Shape suitability and mechanical safety of customised hip implants: Three-dimensional printed acetabular cup for hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Yeokyung Kang; Doo-Hoon Sun; Jong-Chul Park; Jungsung Kim
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2022-08-27

6.  A New Classification System for Acetabular Bone Defect Evaluation in Posttraumatic Acetabular Nonunion and Malunion.

Authors:  Ramesh K Sen; Reet Mukhopadhyay; Veeresh Pattanshetti; Gaurav Saini; Sujit Kumar Tripathy; Siddharth Sekhar Sethy; Suresh Kumar Sharma
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 1.033

7.  Reliability and validity test of a novel three-dimensional acetabular bone defect classification system aided with additive manufacturing.

Authors:  Jingwei Zhang; Yi Hu; Hua Ying; Yuanqing Mao; Zhenan Zhu; Huiwu Li
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 2.562

8.  Tantalum in type IV and V Paprosky periprosthetic acetabular fractures surgery in Paprosky type IV and V periprosthetic acetabular fractures surgery.

Authors:  G Falzarano; A Piscopo; G Rollo; A Medici; P Grubor; M Bisaccia; V Pipola; R Cioffi; F Nobile; L Meccariello
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2017-09-30

9.  The use of a triflange salvage system for catastrophic pelvic osteolysis after failed total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Matthew A Siegel; Michael J Patetta; Jason Y Chen; Diego M Barragan Echenique; Mark H Gonzalez
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2021-04-02

10.  [Short- and mid-term effectiveness of impaction bone allograft with acetabular components in treatment of severe acetabular defects].

Authors:  Leilei Chen; Guoju Hong; Tianye Lin; Linfeng Huang; Qingwen Zhang; Wei He
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2020-03-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.