Literature DB >> 11397534

Use of overpressure to assess the role of bubbles in focused ultrasound lesion shape in vitro.

M R Bailey1, L N Couret, O A Sapozhnikov, V A Khokhlova, G ter Haar, S Vaezy, X Shi, R Martin, L A Crum.   

Abstract

Overpressure--elevated hydrostatic pressure--was used to assess the role of gas or vapor bubbles in distorting the shape and position of a high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) lesion in tissue. The shift from a cigar-shaped lesion to a tadpole-shaped lesion can mean that the wrong area is treated. Overpressure minimizes bubbles and bubble activity by dissolving gas bubbles, restricting bubble oscillation and raising the boiling temperature. Therefore, comparison with and without overpressure is a tool to assess the role of bubbles. Dissolution rates, bubble dynamics and boiling temperatures were determined as functions of pressure. Experiments were made first in a low-overpressure chamber (0.7 MPa maximum) that permitted imaging by B-mode ultrasound (US). Pieces of excised beef liver (8 cm thick) were treated in the chamber with 3.5 MHz for 1 to 7 s (50% duty cycle). In situ intensities (I(SP)) were 600 to 3000 W/cm(2). B-mode US imaging detected a hyperechoic region at the HIFU treatment site. The dissipation of this hyperechoic region following HIFU cessation corresponded well with calculated bubble dissolution rates; thus, suggesting that bubbles were present. Lesion shape was then tested in a high-pressure chamber. Intensities were 1300 and 1750 W/cm(2) ( +/- 20%) at 1 MHz for 30 s. Hydrostatic pressures were 0.1 or 5.6 MPa. At 1300 W/cm(2), lesions were cigar-shaped, and no difference was observed between lesions formed with or without overpressure. At 1750 W/cm(2), lesions formed with no overpressure were tadpole-shaped, but lesions formed with high overpressure (5.6 MPa) remained cigar-shaped. Data support the hypothesis that bubbles contribute to the lesion distortion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11397534     DOI: 10.1016/s0301-5629(01)00342-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  27 in total

1.  Analysis of clinical effect of high-intensity focused ultrasound on liver cancer.

Authors:  Chuan-Xing Li; Guo-Liang Xu; Zhen-You Jiang; Jian-Jun Li; Guang-Yu Luo; Hong-Bo Shan; Rong Zhang; Yin Li
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2004-08-01       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Cavitation clouds created by shock scattering from bubbles during histotripsy.

Authors:  Adam D Maxwell; Tzu-Yin Wang; Charles A Cain; J Brian Fowlkes; Oleg A Sapozhnikov; Michael R Bailey; Zhen Xu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Improved visualization of high-intensity focused ultrasound lesions.

Authors:  Ronald H Silverman; Robert Muratore; Jeffrey A Ketterling; Jonathan Mamou; D Jackson Coleman; Ernest J Feleppa
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.998

4.  Measurement of high intensity focused ultrasound fields by a fiber optic probe hydrophone.

Authors:  Yufeng Zhou; Liang Zhai; Rebecca Simmons; Pei Zhong
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Investigation into the mechanisms of tissue atomization by high-intensity focused ultrasound.

Authors:  Julianna C Simon; Oleg A Sapozhnikov; Yak-Nam Wang; Vera A Khokhlova; Lawrence A Crum; Michael R Bailey
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 2.998

6.  Magnetic resonance imaging of boiling induced by high intensity focused ultrasound.

Authors:  Tatiana D Khokhlova; Michael S Canney; Donghoon Lee; Kenneth I Marro; Lawrence A Crum; Vera A Khokhlova; Michael R Bailey
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Prevention of post-focal thermal damage by formation of bubbles at the focus during high intensity focused ultrasound therapy.

Authors:  Vesna Zderic; Jessica Foley; Wenbo Luo; Shahram Vaezy
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Emerging local ablation techniques.

Authors:  Michael J Stone; Bradford J Wood
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.513

9.  Ultrasound-Induced Bubble Clusters in Tissue-Mimicking Agar Phantoms.

Authors:  Pooya Movahed; Wayne Kreider; Adam D Maxwell; Barbrina Dunmire; Jonathan B Freund
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2017-07-22       Impact factor: 2.998

10.  A microbubble agent improves the therapeutic efficiency of high intensity focused ultrasound: a rabbit kidney study.

Authors:  Tinghe Yu; Guoyun Wang; Kai Hu; Ping Ma; Jin Bai; Zhibiao Wang
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2003-12-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.