Literature DB >> 8795175

The intensity dependence of the site of maximal energy deposition in focused ultrasound surgery.

N A Watkin1, G R ter Haar, I Rivens.   

Abstract

The relationship between spatial peak intensity and the position of ultrasound induced tissue damage was studied in in vitro tissue models, using a 1.69 MHz spherical bowl transducer. The models corresponded to the transabdominal route to the bladder and prostate, which are potential target sites for focused ultrasound surgery. The results confirm that there is a relationship between lesion position and intensity, with lesions forming, under some exposure conditions, ahead of the geometric focus. Forward growth of lesions appears to be due to changes in the absorption characteristics of the tissue in the beam path. Using a computer model, we have demonstrated that the absorption coefficient of the tissue must increase significantly in front of the focus to enable lesions to form ahead of the predicted position. A possible mechanism for this is bubble formation as a result of acoustic cavitation. The effect of nonlinear propagation in the tissue, at the intensities studied, is shown to be relatively small.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8795175     DOI: 10.1016/0301-5629(95)02062-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  19 in total

1.  Experimental evaluation of lesion prediction modelling in the presence of cavitation bubbles: intended for high-intensity focused ultrasound prostate treatment.

Authors:  L Curiel; F Chavrier; B Gignoux; S Pichardo; S Chesnais; J Y Chapelon
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Measurement of high intensity focused ultrasound fields by a fiber optic probe hydrophone.

Authors:  Yufeng Zhou; Liang Zhai; Rebecca Simmons; Pei Zhong
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Magnetic resonance imaging of boiling induced by high intensity focused ultrasound.

Authors:  Tatiana D Khokhlova; Michael S Canney; Donghoon Lee; Kenneth I Marro; Lawrence A Crum; Vera A Khokhlova; Michael R Bailey
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Prevention of post-focal thermal damage by formation of bubbles at the focus during high intensity focused ultrasound therapy.

Authors:  Vesna Zderic; Jessica Foley; Wenbo Luo; Shahram Vaezy
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 5.  MR-guided focused ultrasound surgery, present and future.

Authors:  David Schlesinger; Stanley Benedict; Chris Diederich; Wladyslaw Gedroyc; Alexander Klibanov; James Larner
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Passive cavitation imaging with ultrasound arrays.

Authors:  Vasant A Salgaonkar; Saurabh Datta; Christy K Holland; T Douglas Mast
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Acoustic emissions during 3.1 MHz ultrasound bulk ablation in vitro.

Authors:  T Douglas Mast; Vasant A Salgaonkar; Chandrapriya Karunakaran; John A Besse; Saurabh Datta; Christy K Holland
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2008-04-16       Impact factor: 2.998

8.  Ultrasound-Induced Bubble Clusters in Tissue-Mimicking Agar Phantoms.

Authors:  Pooya Movahed; Wayne Kreider; Adam D Maxwell; Barbrina Dunmire; Jonathan B Freund
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2017-07-22       Impact factor: 2.998

9.  Spatial specificity and sensitivity of passive cavitation imaging for monitoring high-intensity focused ultrasound thermal ablation in ex vivo bovine liver.

Authors:  Kevin Haworth; Vasant A Salgaonkar; Nicholas M Corregan; Christy K Holland; T D Mast
Journal:  Proc Meet Acoust       Date:  2013-06-02

10.  Shock-induced heating and millisecond boiling in gels and tissue due to high intensity focused ultrasound.

Authors:  Michael S Canney; Vera A Khokhlova; Olga V Bessonova; Michael R Bailey; Lawrence A Crum
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 2.998

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.