Literature DB >> 1729718

Psychophysical support for a two-dimensional view interpolation theory of object recognition.

H H Bülthoff1, S Edelman.   

Abstract

Does the human brain represent objects for recognition by storing a series of two-dimensional snapshots, or are the object models, in some sense, three-dimensional analogs of the objects they represent? One way to address this question is to explore the ability of the human visual system to generalize recognition from familiar to unfamiliar views of three-dimensional objects. Three recently proposed theories of object recognition--viewpoint normalization or alignment of three-dimensional models [Ullman, S. (1989) Cognition 32, 193-254], linear combination of two-dimensional views [Ullman, S. & Basri, R. (1990) Recognition by Linear Combinations of Models (Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge), A. I. Memo No. 1152], and view approximation [Poggio, T. & Edelman, S. (1990) Nature (London) 343, 263-266]--predict different patterns of generalization to unfamiliar views. We have exploited the conflicting predictions to test the three theories directly in a psychophysical experiment involving computer-generated three-dimensional objects. Our results suggest that the human visual system is better described as recognizing these objects by two-dimensional view interpolation than by alignment or other methods that rely on object-centered three-dimensional models.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1729718      PMCID: PMC48175          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.89.1.60

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  8 in total

1.  A self-organizing multiple-view representation of 3D objects.

Authors:  S Edelman; D Weinshall
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.086

2.  Regularization algorithms for learning that are equivalent to multilayer networks.

Authors:  T Poggio; F Girosi
Journal:  Science       Date:  1990-02-23       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  A network that learns to recognize three-dimensional objects.

Authors:  T Poggio; S Edelman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1990-01-18       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Representation and recognition of the spatial organization of three-dimensional shapes.

Authors:  D Marr; H K Nishihara
Journal:  Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1978-02-23

5.  Aligning pictorial descriptions: an approach to object recognition.

Authors:  S Ullman
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1989-08

6.  Can we imagine how objects look from other viewpoints?

Authors:  I Rock; D Wheeler; L Tudor
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  A case of viewer-centered object perception.

Authors:  I Rock; J DiVita
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  The internal representation of solid shape with respect to vision.

Authors:  J J Koenderink; A J van Doorn
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1979-05-02       Impact factor: 2.086

  8 in total
  89 in total

1.  Effects of temporal association on recognition memory.

Authors:  G Wallis; H H Bülthoff
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-04-03       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The prototype effect in face recognition: extension and limits.

Authors:  R Cabeza; V Bruce; T Kato; M Oda
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-01

3.  Viewpoint-invariant and viewpoint-dependent object recognition in dissociable neural subsystems.

Authors:  E D Burgund; C J Marsolek
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2000-09

4.  Categorical perception of relative orientation in visual object recognition.

Authors:  L J Rosielle; E E Cooper
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2001-01

5.  Recognizing rotated views of objects: interpolation versus generalization by humans and pigeons.

Authors:  Marcia L Spetch; Alinda Friedman
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-03

6.  Recognizing novel three-dimensional objects by summing signals from parts and views.

Authors:  David H Foster; Stuart J Gilson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-09-22       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Visual object categorization in birds and primates: integrating behavioral, neurobiological, and computational evidence within a "general process" framework.

Authors:  Fabian A Soto; Edward A Wasserman
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.282

8.  Hierarchical processing of face viewpoint in human visual cortex.

Authors:  Vadim Axelrod; Galit Yovel
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 9.  Uncovering the visual "alphabet": advances in our understanding of object perception.

Authors:  Leslie G Ungerleider; Andrew H Bell
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Using the reassignment procedure to test object representation in pigeons and people.

Authors:  Jessie J Peissig; Yasuo Nagasaka; Michael E Young; Edward A Wasserman; Irving Biederman
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.986

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.