Literature DB >> 33723725

Perspective taking and systematic biases in object location memory.

Vladislava Segen1,2, Giorgio Colombo3, Marios Avraamides4,5, Timothy Slattery6, Jan M Wiener7,6.   

Abstract

The aim of the current study was to develop a novel task that allows for the quick assessment of spatial memory precision with minimal technical and training requirements. In this task, participants memorized the position of an object in a virtual room and then judged from a different perspective, whether the object has moved to the left or to the right. Results revealed that participants exhibited a systematic bias in their responses that we termed the reversed congruency effect. Specifically, they performed worse when the camera and the object moved in the same direction than when they moved in opposite directions. Notably, participants responded correctly in almost 100% of the incongruent trials, regardless of the distance by which the object was displaced. In Experiment 2, we showed that this effect cannot be explained by the movement of the object on the screen, but that it relates to the perspective shift and the movement of the object in the virtual world. We also showed that the presence of additional objects in the environment reduces the reversed congruency effect such that it no longer predicts performance. In Experiment 3, we showed that the reversed congruency effect is greater in older adults, suggesting that the quality of spatial memory and perspective-taking abilities are critical. Overall, our results suggest that this effect is driven by difficulties in the precise encoding of object locations in the environment and in understanding how perspective shifts affect the projected positions of the objects in the two-dimensional image.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D perception: Space Perception; Spatial cognition; Spatial memory

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33723725      PMCID: PMC7959304          DOI: 10.3758/s13414-021-02243-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  66 in total

1.  The parahippocampal place area: recognition, navigation, or encoding?

Authors:  R Epstein; A Harris; D Stanley; N Kanwisher
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  The Venus effect: people's understanding of mirror reflections in paintings.

Authors:  Marco Bertamini; Richard Latto; Alice Spooner
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.490

3.  Distinctive features of spatial perspective-taking in the elderly.

Authors:  Masayuki Watanabe
Journal:  Int J Aging Hum Dev       Date:  2011

4.  Hippocampal CA1 gamma power predicts the precision of spatial memory judgments.

Authors:  Rebecca F Stevenson; Jie Zheng; Lilit Mnatsakanyan; Sumeet Vadera; Robert T Knight; Jack J Lin; Michael A Yassa
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-09-17       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Path Complexity in Virtual Water Maze Navigation: Differential Associations with Age, Sex, and Regional Brain Volume.

Authors:  Ana M Daugherty; Peng Yuan; Cheryl L Dahle; Andrew R Bender; Yiqin Yang; Naftali Raz
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2014-05-23       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  Impairments in precision, rather than spatial strategy, characterize performance on the virtual Morris Water Maze: A case study.

Authors:  Branden S Kolarik; Kiarash Shahlaie; Abdul Hassan; Alyssa A Borders; Kyle C Kaufman; Gene Gurkoff; Andy P Yonelinas; Arne D Ekstrom
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Topographical short-term memory differentiates Alzheimer's disease from frontotemporal lobar degeneration.

Authors:  Chris M Bird; Dennis Chan; Tom Hartley; Yolande A Pijnenburg; Martin N Rossor; Neil Burgess
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.899

8.  Visual short-term memory binding deficit in familial Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Yuying Liang; Yoni Pertzov; Jennifer M Nicholas; Susie M D Henley; Sebastian Crutch; Felix Woodward; Kelvin Leung; Nick C Fox; Masud Husain
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2016-02-06       Impact factor: 4.027

9.  The 4 Mountains Test: A Short Test of Spatial Memory with High Sensitivity for the Diagnosis of Pre-dementia Alzheimer's Disease.

Authors:  Dennis Chan; Laura Marie Gallaher; Kuven Moodley; Ludovico Minati; Neil Burgess; Tom Hartley
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 1.355

10.  Forgetting what was where: the fragility of object-location binding.

Authors:  Yoni Pertzov; Mia Yuan Dong; Muy-Cheng Peich; Masud Husain
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-31       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  The role of memory and perspective shifts in systematic biases during object location estimation.

Authors:  Vladislava Segen; Giorgio Colombo; Marios Avraamides; Timothy Slattery; Jan M Wiener
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 2.157

2.  Comparable performance on a spatial memory task in data collected in the lab and online.

Authors:  Vladislava Segen; Marios Avraamides; Timothy Slattery; Giorgio Colombo; Jan Malte Wiener
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.