Literature DB >> 10540816

Orientation-specific effects in picture matching and naming.

J E Murray1.   

Abstract

In two experiments, subjects made timed decisions about the second of two sequentially presented rotated drawings of objects. When the two objects were physically identical, response times to decide whether the two drawings depicted the same object varied as a function of the shortest distance between the orientation of the second drawing and either the orientation of the previous drawing or the upright. This was found for both short (250-msec) and long (2-sec) interstimulus-intervals. The result was also obtained when subjects named the second drawing after deciding whether the first drawing faced left or right. Following repeated experience with the drawings in the left/right task over four blocks of trials, time to name the second drawing in the same-object sequences was independent of orientation. These results suggest that, initially, object- and orientation-specific representations can be formed following a single presentation of a rotated object and subsequently used to identify drawings of the same object at either the same or different orientations. Alignment of the second drawing with either the canonical representation or the new representation at the previous orientation is achieved by normalization through the shortest path. Following experience with the objects, orientation-invariant representations are formed.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10540816     DOI: 10.3758/bf03198540

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  26 in total

1.  Reference frame and effects of orientation on finding the tops of rotated objects.

Authors:  P A McMullen; P Jolicoeur
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Identification of disoriented objects: effects of context of prior presentation.

Authors:  P Jolicoeur; B Milliken
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Imagining and naming rotated natural objects.

Authors:  J E Murray
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1995-06

4.  Negative priming by rotated objects.

Authors:  J E Murray
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1995-12

5.  View specificity in object processing: evidence from picture matching.

Authors:  R Lawson; G W Humphreys
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Naming and locating the tops of rotated pictures.

Authors:  R H Maki
Journal:  Can J Psychol       Date:  1986-12

7.  Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding.

Authors:  Irving Biederman
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Is human object recognition better described by geon structural descriptions or by multiple views? Comment on Biederman and Gerhardstein (1993).

Authors:  M J Tarr; H H Bülthoff
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Codes and operations in picture matching.

Authors:  G K Humphrey; S J Lupker
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1993

10.  A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity.

Authors:  J G Snodgrass; M Vanderwart
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Learn       Date:  1980-03
View more
  4 in total

1.  Categorical perception of relative orientation in visual object recognition.

Authors:  L J Rosielle; E E Cooper
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2001-01

2.  Hip dislocation: are hip precautions necessary in anterior approaches?

Authors:  Camilo Restrepo; S M Javad Mortazavi; Justin Brothers; Javad Parvizi; Richard H Rothman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Egocentric and nonegocentric coding in memory for spatial layout: evidence from scene recognition.

Authors:  David Waller
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-04

4.  The role of perceptual load in object recognition.

Authors:  Nilli Lavie; Zhicheng Lin; Nahid Zokaei; Volker Thoma
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.332

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.