Literature DB >> 16933431

Reaching with alien limbs: visual exposure to prosthetic hands in a mirror biases proprioception without accompanying illusions of ownership.

Nicholas P Holmes1, Hendrikus J Snijders, Charles Spence.   

Abstract

In five experiments, we investigated the effects of visual exposure to a real hand, arubber hand, or a wooden block on reaching movements made with the unseen left hand behind a parasagittal mirror. Participants reached from one of four starting positions, corresponding to four levels of conflict between the proprioceptively and visually specified positions of the reaching hand. Reaching movements were affected most by exposure to the real hand, intermediately by the rubber hand, and least of all by the wooden block When the posture and/or movement of the visible hand was incompatible with that of the reaching hand, the effect on reaching was reduced. A "rubber hand illusion" questionnaire revealed that illusions of ownership of the rubber hand were not strongly correlated with reaching performance. This research suggests that proprioception is recalibrated following visual exposure to prosthetic hands and that this recalibration is independent of the rubber hand illusion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16933431      PMCID: PMC1564193          DOI: 10.3758/bf03208768

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  34 in total

1.  Visual enhancing of tactile perception in the posterior parietal cortex.

Authors:  Tony Ro; Ruth Wallace; Judith Hagedorn; Alessandro Farnè; Elizabeth Pienkos
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Links between vision and somatosensation. Vision can improve the felt position of the unseen hand.

Authors:  R Newport; J V Hindle; S R Jackson
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2001-06-26       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  Multisensory representation of limb position in human premotor cortex.

Authors:  Donna M Lloyd; David I Shore; Charles Spence; Gemma A Calvert
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  Rubber hands 'feel' touch that eyes see.

Authors:  M Botvinick; J Cohen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-02-19       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Left tactile extinction following visual stimulation of a rubber hand.

Authors:  A Farnè; F Pavani; F Meneghello; E Làdavas
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 13.501

6.  Visual capture of touch: out-of-the-body experiences with rubber gloves.

Authors:  F Pavani; C Spence; J Driver
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2000-09

7.  Doing it with mirrors: a case study of a novel approach to neurorehabilitation.

Authors:  K Sathian; A I Greenspan; S L Wolf
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.919

8.  Visual bias of unseen hand position with a mirror: spatial and temporal factors.

Authors:  Nicholas P Holmes; Charles Spence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-07-20       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  When mirrors lie: "visual capture" of arm position impairs reaching performance.

Authors:  Nicholas P Holmes; Gemma Crozier; Charles Spence
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.282

10.  The effect of viewing the static hand prior to movement onset on pointing kinematics and variability.

Authors:  Y Rossetti; G Stelmach; M Desmurget; C Prablanc; M Jeannerod
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  68 in total

1.  The kinaesthetic mirror illusion: How much does the mirror matter?

Authors:  Marie Chancel; Clémentine Brun; Anne Kavounoudias; Michel Guerraz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  On the relations between affordance and representation of the agent's effector.

Authors:  Filippo Barbieri; Antimo Buonocore; Paolo Bernardis; Riccardo Dalla Volta; Maurizio Gentilucci
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-02-01       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Optokinetic stimulation induces illusory movement of both out-of-the-body and on-the-body hand-held visual objects.

Authors:  P Revol; A Farnè; L Pisella; N P Holmes; A Imai; K Susami; K Koga; Y Rossetti
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-02-08       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Distorting the visual size of the hand affects hand pre-shaping during grasping.

Authors:  Barbara F M Marino; Natale Stucchi; Elena Nava; Patrick Haggard; Angelo Maravita
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-01-01       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  The role of the right temporoparietal junction in intersensory conflict: detection or resolution?

Authors:  Liuba Papeo; Matthew R Longo; Matteo Feurra; Patrick Haggard
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-03-09       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Multisensory temporal processing in own-body contexts: plausibility of hand ownership does not improve visuo-tactile asynchrony detection.

Authors:  Robert T Keys; Anina N Rich; Regine Zopf
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  The weight of representing the body: addressing the potentially indefinite number of body representations in healthy individuals.

Authors:  Marjolein P M Kammers; Joris Mulder; Frédérique de Vignemont; H Chris Dijkerman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-09-22       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Judgements of hand location and hand spacing show minimal proprioceptive drift.

Authors:  Alex Rana; Annie A Butler; Simon C Gandevia; Martin E Héroux
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Explaining away the body: experiences of supernaturally caused touch and touch on non-hand objects within the rubber hand illusion.

Authors:  Jakob Hohwy; Bryan Paton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-02-24       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  How many motoric body representations can we grasp?

Authors:  Marjolein P M Kammers; Joyce A Kootker; Hinze Hogendoorn; H Chris Dijkerman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-12-29       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.