Literature DB >> 7843319

The effect of viewing the static hand prior to movement onset on pointing kinematics and variability.

Y Rossetti1, G Stelmach, M Desmurget, C Prablanc, M Jeannerod.   

Abstract

Pointing accuracy and arm movement kinematics of six human subjects were measured in three conditions where the hand was never visible during the ongoing movement: (1) in the dark; (2) the static hand was seen in peripheral vision prior to target presentation, but not during the reaction time (H-T); (3) the static hand was seen in peripheral vision until movement onset (H+T). It was shown that: (1) viewing the hand prior to movement decreased pointing variability as compared to the dark condition. (2) Viewing simultaneously hand and target (H+T) and further decreased pointing variability as compared to the H-T condition. This effect was proportional to the reaction time. (3) A lengthening of the deceleration phase was observed for movements performed in the H+T condition, as compared to the other two conditions. (4) A negative correlation between variability and the first part of the deceleration phase was observed in the H+T condition, but neither in the H-T condition nor in the dark. These results suggest that the decrease in pointing variability observed in the H+T condition is due to a feedback based on kinesthetic reafference. Better encoding of the initial position of the hand relative to the target (as in H+T) would allow a calibration of arm position sense, which is used to drive the hand toward the target during the deceleration phase.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7843319     DOI: 10.1007/bf00228753

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  23 in total

1.  Proprioceptive control of goal-directed movements in man, studied by means of vibratory muscle tendon stimulation.

Authors:  C Redon; L Hay; J L Velay
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 1.328

2.  Movements in monkeys with deafferented forelimbs.

Authors:  H D KNAPP; E TAUB; A J BERMAN
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  1963-04       Impact factor: 5.330

3.  Vision and proprioception in simple catching.

Authors:  M M Smyth; A M Marriott
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 1.328

4.  Does limb proprioception drift?

Authors:  J P Wann; S F Ibrahim
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  The effect of accuracy constraints on three-dimensional movement kinematics.

Authors:  T E Milner; M M Ijaz
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.590

6.  Roles of proprioceptive input in the programming of arm trajectories.

Authors:  C Ghez; J Gordon; M F Ghilardi; C N Christakos; S E Cooper
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol       Date:  1990

7.  The influence of visual target and limb information on manual aiming.

Authors:  D Elliott
Journal:  Can J Psychol       Date:  1988-03

8.  Constraints on human arm movement trajectories.

Authors:  R G Marteniuk; C L MacKenzie; M Jeannerod; S Athenes; C Dugas
Journal:  Can J Psychol       Date:  1987-09

9.  A proprioceptive contribution to the spatial encoding of position cues for ballistic movements.

Authors:  J Paillard; M Brouchon
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1974-05-17       Impact factor: 3.252

10.  Optimal response of eye and hand motor systems in pointing at a visual target. II. Static and dynamic visual cues in the control of hand movement.

Authors:  C Prablanc; J E Echallier; M Jeannerod; E Komilis
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 2.086

View more
  27 in total

1.  The use of visual feedback and on-line target information in catching and grasping.

Authors:  Thomas Schenk; Barbara Mair; Josef Zihl
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-09-12       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Visual information throughout a reach determines endpoint precision.

Authors:  Anna Ma-Wyatt; Suzanne P McKee
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-11-16       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Immediate compensation for variations in self-generated Coriolis torques related to body dynamics and carried objects.

Authors:  Pascale Pigeon; Paul Dizio; James R Lackner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  The order of gaze shifts affects spatial and temporal aspects of discrete bimanual pointing movements.

Authors:  Masahiro Kokubu; Soichi Ando; Shingo Oda
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-07-30       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Congruent visual and proprioceptive information results in a better encoding of initial hand position.

Authors:  Louis-Nicolas Veilleux; Luc Proteau
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-08-12       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Use of early phase online vision for grip configuration is modulated according to movement duration in prehension.

Authors:  Takao Fukui; Toshio Inui
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Distinct and flexible rates of online control.

Authors:  John de Grosbois; Luc Tremblay
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-07-21

8.  Segment interdependency and gaze anchoring during manual two-segment sequences.

Authors:  Miya K Rand
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-04-26       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Judgements of hand location and hand spacing show minimal proprioceptive drift.

Authors:  Alex Rana; Annie A Butler; Simon C Gandevia; Martin E Héroux
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  On-line corrections for visuomotor errors.

Authors:  Britne A Shabbott; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-03-14       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.