Literature DB >> 20044746

Distorting the visual size of the hand affects hand pre-shaping during grasping.

Barbara F M Marino1, Natale Stucchi, Elena Nava, Patrick Haggard, Angelo Maravita.   

Abstract

Vision of the body is known to affect somatosensory perception (e.g. proprioception or tactile discrimination). However, it is unknown whether visual information about one's own body size can influence bodily action. We tested this by measuring the maximum grip aperture (MGA) parameter of grasping while eight subjects viewed a real size, enlarged or shrunken image of their hand reaching to grasp a cylinder. In the enlarged view condition, the MGA decreased relative to real size view, as if the grasping movement was actually executed with a physically larger hand, thus requiring a smaller grip aperture to grasp the cylinder. Interestingly, MGA remained smaller even after visual feedback was removed. In contrast, no effect was found for the reduced view condition. This asymmetry may reflect the fact that enlargement of body parts is experienced more frequently than shrinkage, notably during normal growth. In conclusion, vision of the body can significantly and persistently affect the internal model of the body used for motor programming.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20044746     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-009-2143-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  33 in total

1.  Effects of object shape and visual feedback on hand configuration during grasping.

Authors:  Luis F Schettino; Sergei V Adamovich; Howard Poizner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-06-03       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Visual Information and Object Size in the Control of Reaching.

Authors:  N. E. Berthier; R. K. Clifton; V. Gullapalli; D. D. McCall; D. J. Robin
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 1.328

3.  Morphing the body: illusory feeling of an elongated arm affects somatosensory homunculus.

Authors:  Michael Schaefer; Herta Flor; Hans-Jochen Heinze; Michael Rotte
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-04-03       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Tool-use induces morphological updating of the body schema.

Authors:  Lucilla Cardinali; Francesca Frassinetti; Claudio Brozzoli; Christian Urquizar; Alice C Roy; Alessandro Farnè
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2009-06-23       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  The rubber hand illusion in action.

Authors:  M P M Kammers; F de Vignemont; L Verhagen; H C Dijkerman
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2008-08-09       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Size-contrast illusions deceive the eye but not the hand.

Authors:  S Aglioti; J F DeSouza; M A Goodale
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  1995-06-01       Impact factor: 10.834

7.  "Alice in Wonderland" syndrome in a patient with infectious mononucleosis.

Authors:  G Sanguineti; F Crovato; R De Marchi; G Desirello
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 5.226

8.  "Body image" disturbances in psychiatric disorders.

Authors:  N Lukianowicz
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  1967-01       Impact factor: 9.319

9.  Visual capture of touch: out-of-the-body experiences with rubber gloves.

Authors:  F Pavani; C Spence; J Driver
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2000-09

10.  Visual illusions, delayed grasping, and memory: no shift from dorsal to ventral control.

Authors:  V H Franz; C Hesse; S Kollath
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2008-09-11       Impact factor: 3.139

View more
  22 in total

1.  Grasping performance depends upon the richness of hand feedback.

Authors:  Prajith Sivakumar; Derek J Quinlan; Kevin M Stubbs; Jody C Culham
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Grasping in wonderland: altering the visual size of the body recalibrates the body schema.

Authors:  N F Bernardi; B F Marino; A Maravita; G Castelnuovo; R Tebano; E Bricolo
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  On-line visual control of grasping movements.

Authors:  Robert Volcic; Fulvio Domini
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 4.  The cognitive neuroscience of prehension: recent developments.

Authors:  Scott T Grafton
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 5.  Upper Limb Motor Impairment After Stroke.

Authors:  Preeti Raghavan
Journal:  Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 1.784

6.  Illusory ownership of a virtual child body causes overestimation of object sizes and implicit attitude changes.

Authors:  Domna Banakou; Raphaela Groten; Mel Slater
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-07-15       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  The signing body: extensive sign language practice shapes the size of hands and face.

Authors:  Laura Mora; Anna Sedda; Teresa Esteban; Gianna Cocchini
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Being Barbie: the size of one's own body determines the perceived size of the world.

Authors:  Björn van der Hoort; Arvid Guterstam; H Henrik Ehrsson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Muscle receptor organs in the crayfish abdomen: a student laboratory exercise in proprioception.

Authors:  Bonnie Leksrisawat; Ann S Cooper; Allison B Gilberts; Robin L Cooper
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2010-11-18       Impact factor: 1.355

10.  Scaling space with the mirror illusion: the influence of body plasticity on perceived affordances.

Authors:  Sarah H Creem-Regehr; Brandon S Payne; Kristina M Rand; Grace Hansen
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.