Literature DB >> 11050034

Left tactile extinction following visual stimulation of a rubber hand.

A Farnè1, F Pavani, F Meneghello, E Làdavas.   

Abstract

In close analogy with neurophysiological findings in monkeys, neuropsychological studies have shown that the human brain constructs visual maps of space surrounding different body parts. In right-brain-damaged patients with tactile extinction, the existence of a visual peripersonal space centred on the hand has been demonstrated by showing that cross-modal visual-tactile extinction is segregated mainly in the space near the hand. That is, tactile stimuli on the contralesional hand are extinguished more consistently by visual stimuli presented near the ipsilesional hand than those presented far from it. Here, we report the first evidence in humans that this hand-centred visual peripersonal space can be coded in relation to a seen rubber replica of the hand, as if it were a real hand. In patients with left tactile extinction, a visual stimulus presented near a seen right rubber hand induced strong cross-modal visual-tactile extinction, similar to that obtained by presenting the same visual stimulus near the patient's right hand. Critically, this specific cross-modal effect was evident when subjects saw the rubber hand as having a plausible posture relative to their own body (i.e. when it was aligned with the subject's right shoulder). In contrast, cross-modal extinction was strongly reduced when the seen rubber hand was arranged in an implausible posture (i. e. misaligned with respect to the subject's right shoulder). We suggest that this phenomenon is due to the dominance of vision over proprioception: the system coding peripersonal space can be 'deceived' by the vision of a fake hand, provided that its appearance looks plausible with respect to the subject's body.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11050034     DOI: 10.1093/brain/123.11.2350

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain        ISSN: 0006-8950            Impact factor:   13.501


  42 in total

1.  Projecting sensations to external objects: evidence from skin conductance response.

Authors:  K Carrie Armel; V S Ramachandran
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-07-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Vision of a pictorial hand modulates visual-tactile interactions.

Authors:  Yuka Igarashi; Norimichi Kitagawa; Shigeru Ichihara
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  Grab an object with a tool and change your body: tool-use-dependent changes of body representation for action.

Authors:  Lucilla Cardinali; Stéphane Jacobs; Claudio Brozzoli; Francesca Frassinetti; Alice C Roy; Alessandro Farnè
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-02-17       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Whose hand is this? Handedness and visual perspective modulate self/other discrimination.

Authors:  Massimiliano Conson; Anna Rita Aromino; Luigi Trojano
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-09-23       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Optokinetic stimulation induces illusory movement of both out-of-the-body and on-the-body hand-held visual objects.

Authors:  P Revol; A Farnè; L Pisella; N P Holmes; A Imai; K Susami; K Koga; Y Rossetti
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-02-08       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  The plausibility of visual information for hand ownership modulates multisensory synchrony perception.

Authors:  Regine Zopf; Jason Friedman; Mark A Williams
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-05-17       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Anatomically plausible illusory posture affects mental rotation of body parts.

Authors:  Silvio Ionta; Anna Sforza; Mariko Funato; Olaf Blanke
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 3.282

8.  Sensory dominance in combinations of audio, visual and haptic stimuli.

Authors:  David Hecht; Miriam Reiner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-11-05       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  To the end! Distribution of attention along a tool in peri- and extrapersonal space.

Authors:  George D Park; Michael Strom; Catherine L Reed
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  How many motoric body representations can we grasp?

Authors:  Marjolein P M Kammers; Joyce A Kootker; Hinze Hogendoorn; H Chris Dijkerman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-12-29       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.