Literature DB >> 19199099

Optokinetic stimulation induces illusory movement of both out-of-the-body and on-the-body hand-held visual objects.

P Revol1, A Farnè, L Pisella, N P Holmes, A Imai, K Susami, K Koga, Y Rossetti.   

Abstract

The coding of body part location may depend upon both visual and proprioceptive information, and allows targets to be localized with respect to the body. The present study investigates the interaction between visual and proprioceptive localization systems under conditions of multisensory conflict induced by optokinetic stimulation (OKS). Healthy subjects were asked to estimate the apparent motion speed of a visual target (LED) that could be located either in the extrapersonal space (visual encoding only, V), or at the same distance, but stuck on the subject's right index finger-tip (visual and proprioceptive encoding, V-P). Additionally, the multisensory condition was performed with the index finger kept in position both passively (V-P passive) and actively (V-P active). Results showed that the visual stimulus was always perceived to move, irrespective of its out- or on-the-body location. Moreover, this apparent motion speed varied consistently with the speed of the moving OKS background in all conditions. Surprisingly, no differences were found between V-P active and V-P passive conditions in the speed of apparent motion. The persistence of the visual illusion during the active posture maintenance reveals a novel condition in which vision totally dominates over proprioceptive information, suggesting that the hand-held visual stimulus was perceived as a purely visual, external object despite its contact with the hand.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19199099     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-008-1696-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  35 in total

1.  Tool-use changes multimodal spatial interactions between vision and touch in normal humans.

Authors:  Angelo Maravita; Charles Spence; Steffan Kennett; Jon Driver
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2002-03

Review 2.  Merging the senses into a robust percept.

Authors:  Marc O Ernst; Heinrich H Bülthoff
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 20.229

3.  Eye and neck proprioceptive messages contribute to the spatial coding of retinal input in visually oriented activities.

Authors:  R Roll; J L Velay; J P Roll
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  The contribution of muscle afferents to kinaesthesia shown by vibration induced illusions of movement and by the effects of paralysing joint afferents.

Authors:  G M Goodwin; D I McCloskey; P B Matthews
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1972       Impact factor: 13.501

5.  A revised analysis of the role of efference in motion perception.

Authors:  R B Post; H W Leibowitz
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.490

6.  Proprioceptive influences on auditory and visual spatial localization.

Authors:  J R Lackner; B Shenker
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Visual capture of touch: out-of-the-body experiences with rubber gloves.

Authors:  F Pavani; C Spence; J Driver
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2000-09

Review 8.  Multimodal integration for the representation of space in the posterior parietal cortex.

Authors:  R A Andersen
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1997-10-29       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Neuropsychological evidence of an integrated visuotactile representation of peripersonal space in humans.

Authors:  E Làdavas; G di Pellegrino; A Farnè; G Zeloni
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Optimal integration of shape information from vision and touch.

Authors:  Hannah B Helbig; Marc O Ernst
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-01-16       Impact factor: 2.064

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.