Literature DB >> 16916806

Diagnostic reference levels and effective dose in paediatric cardiac catheterization.

D G W Onnasch1, F K Schröder, G Fischer, H-H Kramer.   

Abstract

European states within the EEC are required to establish and use diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) in X-ray examinations. However, up to now there have been no DRLs for cardiac catheterization in children, nor as a rule is the effective dose estimated. We have evaluated the dose-area products (DAPs) for three different types of angiocardiography systems over a time span of 8 years. For each system DAP increased in proportion to the body weight (BW) over two orders of magnitude. The proportionality constant decreased over the years. To reduce the broad distribution of DAP the doses for cine acquisition (DAPA) and fluoroscopy (DAPF) were indexed with respect to the total numbers of acquired images (AN) and the total times of fluoroscopy (FT). DAPA/AN is directly proportional to BW with a high correlation (r = 0.896, n = 1346). Likewise, DAPF/FT is proportional to BW from 0.1 kg to 100 kg (r = 0.84, n = 2138). Therefore, by normalizing DAP to BW the growth dependent variation of DAP can be eliminated. There are numerous short examinations with very small total DAPs, which were separated from the group of diagnostic examinations. The mean DAP/BW of this group is 0.41 Gycm2 kg(-1) (90th percentile: 0.81 Gycm2 kg(-1), n = 1106). For interventional procedures in congenital heart diseases DAP/BW is significantly higher (p<0.001) (mean: 0.56 Gycm2 kg(-1), 90th percentile: 1.16 Gycm2 kg(-1), n = 883). There are significant differences between different types of interventional procedures, the mean values being between 0.35 Gycm2 kg(-1) (occlusion of patent ductus botalli, n = 165) and 1.30 Gycm2 kg(-1) (occlusion of ventricular septal defect, n = 32). For patients who are catheterized several times over the years, the cumulative effective dose (E) may reach high values, being especially high for patients with hypoplastic left heart syndrome (typically 11 mSv). E is derived from DAP/BW by use of a constant DAP/BW to E conversion factor, independent of the age of the patient. DAP/BW is appropriate to describe paediatric DRLs and is recommended instead of using mean DAP values for age groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16916806     DOI: 10.1259/bjr/19929794

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  15 in total

Review 1.  Cancer risks associated with external radiation from diagnostic imaging procedures.

Authors:  Martha S Linet; Thomas L Slovis; Donald L Miller; Ruth Kleinerman; Choonsik Lee; Preetha Rajaraman; Amy Berrington de Gonzalez
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2012-02-03       Impact factor: 508.702

2.  Radiation Risk Categories in Cardiac Catheterization for Congenital Heart Disease: A Tool to Aid in the Evaluation of Radiation Outcomes.

Authors:  Brian P Quinn; Aimee K Armstrong; Holly D Bauser-Heaton; Ryan Callahan; Howaida G El-Said; Susan R Foerster; Bryan H Goldstein; Andrea S Goodman; Todd M Gudausky; Jacqueline N Kreutzer; Ryan A Leahy; Christopher J Petit; Toby A Rockefeller; Shabana Shahanavaz; Sara M Trucco; Lisa Bergersen
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 1.655

3.  Radiation exposure in children during the current era of pediatric cardiac intervention.

Authors:  Maiy Hamdy El Sayed; Alaa Mahmoud Roushdy; Hala El Farghaly; Ahmad El Sherbini
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 1.655

4.  Reduction in Radiation Dose in a Pediatric Cardiac Catheterization Lab Using the Philips AlluraClarity X-ray System.

Authors:  Patrick M Sullivan; David Harrison; Sarah Badran; Cheryl M Takao; Frank F Ing
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 1.655

5.  Patient radiation exposure in a modern, large-volume, pediatric cardiac catheterization laboratory.

Authors:  Andrew C Glatz; Akash Patel; Xiaowei Zhu; Yoav Dori; Brian D Hanna; Matthew J Gillespie; Jonathan J Rome
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2014-01-18       Impact factor: 1.655

6.  Reducing Fluoroscopic Radiation Exposure During Endomyocardial Biopsy in Pediatric Transplant Recipients.

Authors:  Jeffrey G Gossett; Christina L Sammet; Anya Agrawal; Karen Rychlik; David F Wax
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2016-11-23       Impact factor: 1.655

7.  Percutaneous closure of ventricular septal defects in children: key parameters affecting patient radiation exposure.

Authors:  Raymond N Haddad; Chadia Rizk; Zakhia Saliba; Jad Farah
Journal:  Am J Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2021-02-15

8.  Radiation safety protocol using real-time dose reporting reduces patient exposure in pediatric electrophysiology procedures.

Authors:  Akash R Patel; Jamie Ganley; Xiaowei Zhu; Jonathan J Rome; Maully Shah; Andrew C Glatz
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 1.655

9.  Local reference levels and organ doses from pediatric cardiac interventional procedures.

Authors:  S Barnaoui; J L Rehel; H Baysson; Y Boudjemline; B Girodon; M O Bernier; D Bonnet; B Aubert
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 1.655

Review 10.  Children's exposure to diagnostic medical radiation and cancer risk: epidemiologic and dosimetric considerations.

Authors:  Martha S Linet; Kwang Pyo Kim; Preetha Rajaraman
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2008-12-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.