Literature DB >> 31543283

A computational formulation of the behavior systems account of the temporal organization of motivated behavior.

Federico Sanabria1, Carter W Daniels2, Tanya Gupta3, Cristina Santos4.   

Abstract

The behavior systems framework suggests that motivated behavior-e.g., seeking food and mates, avoiding predators-consists of sequences of actions organized within nested behavioral states. This framework has bridged behavioral ecology and experimental psychology, providing key insights into critical behavioral processes. In particular, the behavior systems framework entails a particular organization of behavior over time. The present paper examines whether such organization emerges from a generic Markov process, where the current behavioral state determines the probability distribution of subsequent behavioral states. This proposition is developed as a systematic examination of increasingly complex Markov models, seeking a computational formulation that balances adherence to the behavior systems approach, parsimony, and conformity to data. As a result of this exercise, a nonstationary partially hidden Markov model is selected as a computational formulation of the predatory subsystem. It is noted that the temporal distribution of discrete responses may further unveil the structure and parameters of the model but, without proper mathematical modeling, these discrete responses may be misleading. Opportunities for further elaboration of the proposed computational formulation are identified, including developments in its architecture, extensions to defensive and reproductive subsystems, and methodological refinements.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Algorithm; Behavior system; Bout; Markov model; Reinforcement; Temporal organization

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31543283      PMCID: PMC6907728          DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2019.103952

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Processes        ISSN: 0376-6357            Impact factor:   1.777


  65 in total

1.  MPR.

Authors:  Peter R. Killeen; Matthew T. Sitomer
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2003-04-28       Impact factor: 1.777

2.  Interresponse times and the structure of choice.

Authors:  Michael Davison
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2004-06-30       Impact factor: 1.777

3.  On drive, conflict and instinct, and the functional organization of behavior.

Authors:  G P Baerends
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  1976       Impact factor: 2.453

4.  Interresponse time structures in variable-ratio and variable-interval schedules.

Authors:  Matthew T Bowers; Jade Hill; William L Palya
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 5.  Motivational control of sign-tracking behaviour: A theoretical framework.

Authors:  Patrick Anselme
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 8.989

6.  The effect of methylphenidate and rearing environment on behavioral inhibition in adult male rats.

Authors:  Jade C Hill; Pablo Covarrubias; Joel Terry; Federico Sanabria
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2011-11-05       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  A microstructural analysis of schedule-induced polydipsia reveals incentive-induced hyperactivity in an animal model of ADHD.

Authors:  Javier Íbias; Ricardo Pellón; Federico Sanabria
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2014-10-27       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Moving on with foraging theory: incorporating movement decisions into the functional response of a gregarious shorebird.

Authors:  Jan A van Gils; Matthijs van der Geest; Brecht De Meulenaer; Hanneke Gillis; Theunis Piersma; Eelke O Folmer
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 5.091

9.  Time representation in reinforcement learning models of the basal ganglia.

Authors:  Samuel J Gershman; Ahmed A Moustafa; Elliot A Ludvig
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 2.380

10.  Causal reasoning in rats' behaviour systems.

Authors:  Robert Ian Bowers; William Timberlake
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2018-07-04       Impact factor: 2.963

View more
  2 in total

1.  Longer operant lever-press duration requirements induce fewer but longer response bouts in rats.

Authors:  Ryan J Brackney; Raul Garcia; Federico Sanabria
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 1.986

2.  Simulating bout-and-pause patterns with reinforcement learning.

Authors:  Kota Yamada; Atsunori Kanemura
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.