Literature DB >> 16877155

Computed tomography measurement of the accuracy of component version in total hip arthroplasty.

Andrew P Wines1, David McNicol.   

Abstract

The version of the acetabular and femoral components in 111 primary total hip arthroplasties was prospectively evaluated intraoperatively by the surgeon and compared with postoperative computed tomography (CT) scan measurements. Intraoperative estimations by the surgeons for acetabular and femoral components were all within 10 degrees to 30 degrees anteversion, with means of 16.0 degrees (SD = 4.0 degrees ) and 16.4 degrees (SD = 3.2 degrees ), respectively. However, CT scan acetabular measurements ranged from 12 degrees retroversion to 52 degrees anteversion (mean = 22.0 degrees anteversion, SD = 14.0 degrees ). Similarly, femoral component version ranged from -15 degrees retroversion to 45 degrees anteversion (mean = 16.8 degrees anteversion, SD = 11.1 degrees ). According to CT calculations, only 71% of femoral and 45% of acetabular components were within the expected clinical version range. In conclusion, the intraoperative estimation of acetabular and femoral version in a total hip arthroplasty is of limited accuracy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16877155     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2005.11.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  50 in total

1.  [Principles and new concepts in computer-navigated total hip arthroplasty].

Authors:  T Renkawitz; M Wörner; E Sendtner; M Weber; P Lechler; J Grifka
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Intraoperative radiographs for placing acetabular components in hip resurfacing arthroplasty.

Authors:  Thomas P Gross; Fei Liu; Lee Webb
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Three-dimensional biplanar radiography as a new means of accessing femoral version: a comparitive study of EOS three-dimensional radiography versus computed tomography.

Authors:  M Lucius Pomerantz; Diana Glaser; Josh Doan; Sita Kumar; Eric W Edmonds
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2014-10-17       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Combined anteversion technique reduced the dislocation in cementless total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Yasuharu Nakashima; Masanobu Hirata; Mio Akiyama; Takashi Itokawa; Takuaki Yamamoto; Goro Motomura; Masanobu Ohishi; Satoshi Hamai; Yukihide Iwamoto
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Navigated non-image-based positioning of the acetabulum during total hip replacement.

Authors:  Jean-Yves Jenny; Cyril Boeri; Jean-Claude Dosch; Marius Uscatu; Eugen Ciobanu
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-11-13       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Computer-assisted versus manual alignment in THA: a probabilistic approach to range of motion.

Authors:  Anthony J Petrella; Joshua Q Stowe; Darryl D D'Lima; Paul J Rullkoetter; Peter J Laz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-10-22       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Combined anteversion technique for total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Lawrence D Dorr; Aamer Malik; Manish Dastane; Zhinian Wan
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-11-01       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Accuracy of computer navigation for acetabular component placement in THA.

Authors:  James A Ryan; Amir A Jamali; William L Bargar
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-07-24       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  CT evaluation of total hip arthroplasty complication: dissociation of acetabular component.

Authors:  Eric A Bogner; Carolyn M Sofka
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2007-02

10.  Increased anteversion of press-fit femoral stems compared with anatomic femur.

Authors:  Roger H Emerson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.