Literature DB >> 16862405

Pediatric interventional radiography equipment: safety considerations.

Keith J Strauss1.   

Abstract

This paper discusses pediatric image quality and radiation dose considerations in state-of-the-art fluoroscopic imaging equipment. Although most fluoroscopes are capable of automatically providing good image quality on infants, toddlers, and small children, excessive radiation dose levels can result from design deficiencies of the imaging device or inappropriate configuration of the equipment's capabilities when imaging small body parts. Important design features and setup choices at installation and during the clinical use of the imaging device can improve image quality and reduce radiation exposure levels in pediatric patients. Pediatric radiologists and cardiologists, with the help of medical physicists, need to understand the issues involved in creating good image quality at reasonable pediatric patient doses. The control of radiographic technique factors by the generator of the imaging device must provide a large dynamic range of mAs values per exposure pulse during both fluoroscopy and image recording as a function of patient girth, which is the thickness of the patient in the posterior-anterior projection at the umbilicus (less than 10 cm to greater than 30 cm). The range of pulse widths must be limited to less than 10 ms in children to properly freeze patient motion. Variable rate pulsed fluoroscopy can be leveraged to reduce radiation dose to the patient and improve image quality. Three focal spots with nominal sizes of 0.3 mm to 1 mm are necessary on the pediatric unit. A second, lateral imaging plane might be necessary because of the child's limited tolerance of contrast medium. Spectral and spatial beam shaping can improve image quality while reducing the radiation dose. Finally, the level of entrance exposure to the image receptor of the fluoroscope as a function of operator choices, of added filter thickness, of selected pulse rate, of the selected field-of-view and of the patient girth all must be addressed at installation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16862405      PMCID: PMC2663646          DOI: 10.1007/s00247-006-0220-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Radiol        ISSN: 0301-0449


  36 in total

1.  Monochromatic x-rays for medical fluoroscopy and radiography?

Authors:  I W OOSTERKAMP
Journal:  Medicamundi       Date:  1961

2.  Ultra-low-dose routine pediatric radiography utilizing a rare-earth filter.

Authors:  R L Wesenberg; G M Amundson; D L Mueller; S G Coupland
Journal:  Can Assoc Radiol J       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 2.248

3.  Exposure reduction using yttrium filters in a cardiac catheterization unit.

Authors:  J M Campbell; C M Kuntzler; W Nikesch
Journal:  Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn       Date:  1986

4.  The use of carbon fibre material in table tops, cassette fronts and grid covers: magnitude of possible dose reduction.

Authors:  A P Hufton; J G Russell
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Filters for radiation reduction: a comparison.

Authors:  M L Kohn; A W Gooch; W S Keller
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Physical measurements of heavy metal filter performance.

Authors:  A E Burgess
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1985 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Reduction of radiation exposure in radiography of the chest.

Authors:  R P Rossi; B Harnisch; W R Hendee
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  The elimination of grids during intensified fluoroscopy and photofluoro spot imaging.

Authors:  J E Gray; R G Swee
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Relative dose efficiencies of antiscatter grids and air gaps in pediatric radiography.

Authors:  D L McDaniel; G Cohen; L K Wagner; L H Robinson
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1984 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Clinical use of a gadolinium filter in pediatric radiography.

Authors:  M A Johnson; A E Burgess
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  1981
View more
  13 in total

1.  Joint quality improvement guidelines for pediatric arterial access and arteriography: from the Societies of Interventional Radiology and Pediatric Radiology.

Authors:  Manraj K S Heran; Francis Marshalleck; Michael Temple; Clement J Grassi; Bairbre Connolly; Richard B Towbin; Kevin M Baskin; Josee Dubois; Mark J Hogan; Sanjoy Kundu; Donald L Miller; Derek J Roebuck; Steven C Rose; David Sacks; Manrita Sidhu; Michael J Wallace; Darryl A Zuckerman; John F Cardella
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2010-02

2.  Reduction in Radiation Dose in a Pediatric Cardiac Catheterization Lab Using the Philips AlluraClarity X-ray System.

Authors:  Patrick M Sullivan; David Harrison; Sarah Badran; Cheryl M Takao; Frank F Ing
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 1.655

3.  Prospective measurement of patient exposure to radiation during pediatric ureteroscopy.

Authors:  Paul J Kokorowski; Jeanne S Chow; Keith Strauss; Melanie Pennison; Jonathan C Routh; Caleb P Nelson
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-02-16       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 4.  Customized imaging for children and obese people: key issues and strategies.

Authors:  Giovanni Lucignani
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Effective dose estimation for pediatric upper gastrointestinal examinations using an anthropomorphic phantom set and metal oxide semiconductor field-effect transistor (MOSFET) technology.

Authors:  Brent Emigh; Christopher L Gordon; Bairbre L Connolly; Michelle Falkiner; Karen E Thomas
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2013-03-26

6.  A real-time regional adaptive exposure method for saving dose-area product in x-ray fluoroscopy.

Authors:  Steve Burion; Michael A Speidel; Tobias Funk
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  X-ray dose reduction through adaptive exposure in fluoroscopic imaging.

Authors:  Steve Burion; Tobias Funk
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2011-09-11       Impact factor: 1.355

Review 8.  Flat-panel detectors: how much better are they?

Authors:  J Anthony Seibert
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2006-09

9.  Investigation of grid performance using simple image quality tests.

Authors:  Dogan Bor; Ozlem Birgul; Umran Onal; Turan Olgar
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2016 Jan-Mar

Review 10.  Radiation Safety in Children With Congenital and Acquired Heart Disease: A Scientific Position Statement on Multimodality Dose Optimization From the Image Gently Alliance.

Authors:  Kevin D Hill; Donald P Frush; B Kelly Han; Brian G Abbott; Aimee K Armstrong; Robert A DeKemp; Andrew C Glatz; S Bruce Greenberg; Alexander Sheldon Herbert; Henri Justino; Douglas Mah; Mahadevappa Mahesh; Cynthia K Rigsby; Timothy C Slesnick; Keith J Strauss; Sigal Trattner; Mohan N Viswanathan; Andrew J Einstein
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-05-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.