Literature DB >> 16839723

Influence of musical and psychoacoustical training on pitch discrimination.

Christophe Micheyl1, Karine Delhommeau, Xavier Perrot, Andrew J Oxenham.   

Abstract

This study compared the influence of musical and psychoacoustical training on auditory pitch discrimination abilities. In a first experiment, pitch discrimination thresholds for pure and complex tones were measured in 30 classical musicians and 30 non-musicians, none of whom had prior psychoacoustical training. The non-musicians' mean thresholds were more than six times larger than those of the classical musicians initially, and still about four times larger after 2h of training using an adaptive two-interval forced-choice procedure; this difference is two to three times larger than suggested by previous studies. The musicians' thresholds were close to those measured in earlier psychoacoustical studies using highly trained listeners, and showed little improvement with training; this suggests that classical musical training can lead to optimal or nearly optimal pitch discrimination performance. A second experiment was performed to determine how much additional training was required for the non-musicians to obtain thresholds as low as those of the classical musicians from experiment 1. Eight new non-musicians with no prior training practiced the frequency discrimination task for a total of 14 h. It took between 4 and 8h of training for their thresholds to become as small as those measured in the classical musicians from experiment 1. These findings supplement and qualify earlier data in the literature regarding the respective influence of musical and psychoacoustical training on pitch discrimination performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16839723     DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2006.05.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  139 in total

1.  Revisiting place and temporal theories of pitch.

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Acoust Sci Technol       Date:  2013

2.  Musical intervals and relative pitch: frequency resolution, not interval resolution, is special.

Authors:  Josh H McDermott; Michael V Keebler; Christophe Micheyl; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Enhanced brainstem encoding predicts musicians' perceptual advantages with pitch.

Authors:  Gavin M Bidelman; Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2010-12-29       Impact factor: 3.386

4.  Musicians and tone-language speakers share enhanced brainstem encoding but not perceptual benefits for musical pitch.

Authors:  Gavin M Bidelman; Jackson T Gandour; Ananthanarayan Krishnan
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 2.310

5.  Correlations Between Pitch and Phoneme Perception in Cochlear Implant Users and Their Normal Hearing Peers.

Authors:  Raymond L Goldsworthy
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-09-15

6.  Effect of musical training on static and dynamic measures of spectral-pattern discrimination.

Authors:  Stanley Sheft; Kirsten Smayda; Valeriy Shafiro; W Todd Maddox; Bharath Chandrasekaran
Journal:  Proc Meet Acoust       Date:  2013-06-02

Review 7.  A review of the generalization of auditory learning.

Authors:  Beverly A Wright; Yuxuan Zhang
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-02-12       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Pitch-interval discrimination and musical expertise: is the semitone a perceptual boundary?

Authors:  Jean Mary Zarate; Caroline R Ritson; David Poeppel
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Learning for pitch and melody discrimination in congenital amusia.

Authors:  Kelly L Whiteford; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 4.027

10.  Perceptual sensitivity to, and electrophysiological encoding of, a complex periodic signal: effects of age.

Authors:  Sara K Mamo; John H Grose; Emily Buss
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 2.117

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.