Literature DB >> 21562196

The extent of interlimb transfer following adaptation to a novel visuomotor condition does not depend on awareness of the condition.

Jinsung Wang1, Mukta Joshi, Yuming Lei.   

Abstract

There is a controversy in the literature as to whether transfer of motor learning across the arms occurs because of an individual's cognitive awareness of the learned condition. The purpose of this study was to test whether the extent of interlimb transfer following adaptation to a novel visuomotor rotation with one arm, as well as the rate of learning acquired by the other arm, would vary depending on the subjects' awareness of the rotation condition. Awareness of the condition was varied by employing three experimental conditions. In one condition, visual rotation of the display up to 32° was gradually introduced to minimize the subjects' awareness of the rotation during targeted reaching movement. In another condition, the 32° rotation was abruptly introduced from the beginning of the adaptation session. Finally, the subjects were informed regarding the rotation prior to the adaptation session. After adaptation with the left arm under the three conditions, subjects performed reaching movement with the right arm under the same 32° rotation condition. Our results showed that the amount of initial transfer, and also the changes in performance with the right arm, did not vary significantly across the three conditions. This finding suggests that interlimb transfer of visuomotor adaptation does not occur based on an individual's awareness of the manipulation, but rather as a result of implicit generalization of the obtained visuomotor transformation across the arms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21562196      PMCID: PMC3129725          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00254.2011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  25 in total

1.  Evidence for a dynamic-dominance hypothesis of handedness.

Authors:  Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-11-22       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Learned dynamics of reaching movements generalize from dominant to nondominant arm.

Authors:  Sarah E Criscimagna-Hemminger; Opher Donchin; Michael S Gazzaniga; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Is interlimb transfer of force-field adaptation a cognitive response to the sudden introduction of load?

Authors:  Nicole Malfait; David J Ostry
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-09-15       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Interlimb transfer of novel inertial dynamics is asymmetrical.

Authors:  Jinsung Wang; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-03-17       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Contributions of the motor cortex to adaptive control of reaching depend on the perturbation schedule.

Authors:  Jean-Jacques Orban de Xivry; Sarah E Criscimagna-Hemminger; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  Adaptation to gradual as compared with sudden visuo-motor distortions.

Authors:  F A Kagerer; J L Contreras-Vidal; G E Stelmach
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Mechanisms underlying interlimb transfer of visuomotor rotations.

Authors:  Jinsung Wang; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-02-26       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Asymmetrical transfer of training between hands: implications for interhemispheric communication in normal brain.

Authors:  S E Parlow; M Kinsbourne
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 2.310

9.  The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory.

Authors:  R C Oldfield
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1971-03       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  Left-hemisphere motor dominance in righthanders.

Authors:  H G Taylor; K M Heilman
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  1980-12       Impact factor: 4.027

View more
  29 in total

1.  In the absence of physical practice, observation and imagery do not result in updating of internal models for aiming.

Authors:  Nicole T Ong; Beverley C Larssen; Nicola J Hodges
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Human motor plasticity induced by mirror visual feedback.

Authors:  Ippei Nojima; Tatsuya Mima; Satoko Koganemaru; Mohamed Nasreldin Thabit; Hidenao Fukuyama; Toshio Kawamata
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  The training schedule affects the stability, not the magnitude, of the interlimb transfer of learned dynamics.

Authors:  Wilsaan M Joiner; Jordan B Brayanov; Maurice A Smith
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Trial-by-trial analysis of intermanual transfer during visuomotor adaptation.

Authors:  Jordan A Taylor; Greg J Wojaczynski; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Performing a reaching task with one arm while adapting to a visuomotor rotation with the other can lead to complete transfer of motor learning across the arms.

Authors:  Jinsung Wang; Yuming Lei; Jeffrey R Binder
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Proprioceptive recalibration following implicit visuomotor adaptation is preserved in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Erin K Cressman; Danielle Salomonczyk; Alina Constantin; Janis Miyasaki; Elena Moro; Robert Chen; Antonio Strafella; Susan Fox; Anthony E Lang; Howard Poizner; Denise Y P Henriques
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Learning and interlimb transfer of new gait patterns are facilitated by distributed practice across days.

Authors:  Chandramouli Krishnan
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2019-02-23       Impact factor: 2.840

8.  Stimulating the cerebellum affects visuomotor adaptation but not intermanual transfer of learning.

Authors:  Hannah Block; Pablo Celnik
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.847

9.  Lateralized motor control processes determine asymmetry of interlimb transfer.

Authors:  Robert L Sainburg; Sydney Y Schaefer; Vivek Yadav
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 3.590

10.  State-Based Delay Representation and Its Transfer from a Game of Pong to Reaching and Tracking.

Authors:  Guy Avraham; Raz Leib; Assaf Pressman; Lucia S Simo; Amir Karniel; Lior Shmuelof; Ferdinando A Mussa-Ivaldi; Ilana Nisky
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2017-12-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.