Literature DB >> 21909165

Preference as a function of active interresponse times: a test of the active time model.

Paul Misak1, J Mark Cleaveland.   

Abstract

In this article, we describe a test of the active time model for concurrent variable interval (VI) choice. The active time model (ATM) suggests that the time since the most recent response is one of the variables controlling choice in concurrent VI VI schedules of reinforcement. In our experiment, pigeons were trained in a multiple concurrent similar to that employed by Belke (1992), with VI 20-s and VI 40-s schedules in one component, and VI 40-s and VI 80-s schedules in the other component. However, rather than use a free-operant design, we used a discrete-trial procedure that restricted interresponse times to a range of 0.5-9.0 s. After 45 sessions of training, unreinforced probe periods were mixed with reinforced training periods. These probes paired the two stimuli associated with the VI 40-s schedules. Further, the probes were defined such that during their occurrence, interresponse times were either "short" (0.5-3.0 s) or "long" (7.5-9.0 s). All pigeons showed a preference for the stimulus associated with the relatively rich VI 40-s schedule--a result mirroring that of Belke. We also observed, though, that this preference was more extreme during long probes than during short probes--a result predicted by ATM.

Keywords:  Belke (1992); active time model; interresponse times; pigeons; stay/switch model; variable-intervals

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21909165      PMCID: PMC3168888          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2011.96-215

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  20 in total

1.  Synthesizing concurrent interval performances.

Authors:  J S MacDonall
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Reinforcing staying and switching while using a changeover delay.

Authors:  James S MacDonall
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Behavioral variability and frequency-dependent selection.

Authors:  A Machado
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  A progression for generating variable-interval schedules.

Authors:  M FLESHLER; H S HOFFMAN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1962-10       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement.

Authors:  R J HERRNSTEIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-07       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  On two types of deviation from the matching law: bias and undermatching.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  An application of the active time model to multiple concurrent variable-interval schedules.

Authors:  Emily Kathryn Brown; J Mark Cleaveland
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2008-11-06       Impact factor: 1.777

8.  The stay/switch model of concurrent choice.

Authors:  James S MacDonall
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  A further application of the active time model to multiple concurrent variable-interval schedules.

Authors:  Andrew T McKenzie; J Mark Cleaveland
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2009-10-06       Impact factor: 1.777

10.  Matching, undermatching, and overmatching in studies of choice.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  2 in total

1.  Regularities in responding during performance of a complex choice task.

Authors:  Eduardo Mercado; Vladimir Orduña
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.986

2.  Resistance to extinction and relapse in combined stimulus contexts.

Authors:  Christopher A Podlesnik; John Y H Bai; Douglas Elliffe
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 2.468

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.