Literature DB >> 2708942

A test of the melioration theory of matching.

B A Williams1, P Royalty.   

Abstract

Melioration theory entails that matching in concurrent schedules occurs because the subjects equalize the local reinforcement rates (reinforcers received for each alternative divided by the time allocated to each alternative). The role of local reinforcement rates was tested by using multiple schedules in which one component involved an alternative with a high absolute rate of reinforcement and a low local reinforcement rate while the second component involved an alternative with a low absolute rate and a high local rate. These alternatives were then presented simultaneously in probe trials to determine preference between them. Contrary to melioration, the absolute rate of reinforcement, not the local rate, was the controlling variable.

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2708942

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process        ISSN: 0097-7403


  7 in total

1.  Preference and resistance to change in concurrent variable-interval schedules.

Authors:  Matthew C Bell; Ben A Williams
Journal:  Anim Learn Behav       Date:  2002-02

2.  Arousal, changeover responses, and preference in concurrent schedules.

Authors:  Margaret A McDevitt; Ben A Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Changeover behavior and preference in concurrent schedules.

Authors:  B A Williams; M C Bell
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Reinforcer value may change within experimental sessions.

Authors:  F K McSweeney; J N Weatherly; S Swindell
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1996-09

5.  Dynamics of time matching: Arousal makes better seem worse.

Authors:  J Gibbon
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1995-06

6.  Alternative reinforcement increases resistance to change: Pavlovian or operant contingencies?

Authors:  J A Nevin; M E Tota; R D Torquato; R L Shull
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Molar versus local reinforcement probability as determinants of stimulus value.

Authors:  B A Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 2.468

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.