Literature DB >> 8483986

The process of recurrent choice.

D G Davis1, J E Staddon, A Machado, R G Palmer.   

Abstract

Recurrent choice has been studied for many years. A static law, matching, has been established, but there is no consensus on the underlying dynamic process. The authors distinguish between dynamic models in which the model state is identified with directly measurable behavioral properties (performance models) and models in which the relation between behavior and state is indirect (state models). Most popular dynamic choice models are local, performance models. The authors show that behavior in different types of discrimination-reversal experiments and in extinction is not explained by 2 versions of a popular local model and that the nonlocal cumulative-effects model is consistent with matching and that it can duplicate the major properties of recurrent choice in a set of discrimination-reversal experiments. The model can also duplicate results from several other experiments on extinction after complex discrimination training.

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8483986     DOI: 10.1037/0033-295x.100.2.320

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Rev        ISSN: 0033-295X            Impact factor:   8.934


  9 in total

1.  Choice in a variable environment: every reinforcer counts.

Authors:  M Davison; W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Resurgence.

Authors:  B S Cleland; B Guerin; T M Foster; W Temple
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  2001

3.  The dynamics of the law of effect: a comparison of models.

Authors:  Michael A Navakatikyan; Michael Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  The conventional wisdom of behavior analysis.

Authors:  J E Staddon
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Changeover behavior and preference in concurrent schedules.

Authors:  B A Williams; M C Bell
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Dynamic response-by-response models of matching behavior in rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  Brian Lau; Paul W Glimcher
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Is matching innate?

Authors:  C R Gallistel; Adam Philip King; Daniel Gottlieb; Fuat Balci; Efstathios B Papachristos; Matthew Szalecki; Kimberly S Carbone
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Dynamics of time matching: Arousal makes better seem worse.

Authors:  J Gibbon
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1995-06

Review 9.  Resurgence as Choice.

Authors:  Timothy A Shahan; Andrew R Craig
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 1.777

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.