Literature DB >> 5961513

Probabilistically reinforced choice behavior in pigeons.

C P Shimp.   

Abstract

A single principle, "momentary maximizing", may account for much of a pigeon's steady-state behavior in both probability learning and concurrent variable interval experiments. The principle states that a pigeon tends to choose the alternative that momentarily has the higher probability of reinforcement. A successive discrimination procedure, which produced matching in an earlier experiment, produced here a tendency to maximize if training were adequately extended. Maximizing was produced also by other procedures, in which no reinforcing event was presented on some trials: one procedure did and two did not provide a bird with information about the availability of reinforcement on a key after an unreinforced response on the other key. The latter two procedures were analogous to concurrent variable interval schedules in two respects: the reinforcement probability on one key increased while a bird responded on the other key; and they produced matching. But sequential statistics suggested that matching resulted from momentary maximizing. Depending on the procedure, the tendency to maximize produced different relative frequencies of pecking a key for a fixed relative frequency of reinforcement. Computer simulation of maximizing behavior in several concurrent variable interval schedules produced matching and sequential statistics similar to those produced by a real bird.

Mesh:

Year:  1966        PMID: 5961513      PMCID: PMC1338246          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1966.9-443

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  9 in total

1.  THE LINC: A DESCRIPTION OF THE LABORATORY INSTRUMENT COMPUTER.

Authors:  W A CLARK; C E MOLNAR
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1964-07-31       Impact factor: 5.691

2.  Probability-matching in the pigeon.

Authors:  D H BULLOCK; M E BITTERMAN
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1962-12

3.  Concurrent performances: reinforcement interaction and response independence.

Authors:  A C CATANIA
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1963-04       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  SECONDARY REINFORCEMENT AND RATE OF PRIMARY REINFORCEMENT.

Authors:  R J HERRNSTEIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1964-01       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  FURTHER EXPERIMENTS ON PROBABILITY-MATCHING IN THE PIGEON.

Authors:  V GRAF; D H BULLOCK; M E BITTERMAN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1964-03       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  On some determinants of choice in pigeons.

Authors:  G S REYNOLDS
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1963-01       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Relativity of response rate and reinforcement frequency in a multiple schedule.

Authors:  G S REYNOLDS
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-04       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Are theories of learning necessary?

Authors:  B F SKINNER
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1950-07       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  Preference and Switching under Concurrent Scheduling.

Authors:  J D Findley
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1958-04       Impact factor: 2.468

  9 in total
  84 in total

1.  Interresponse-time sensitivity during discrete-trial and free-operant concurrent variable-interval schedules.

Authors:  J M Cleaveland
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Choice, changing over, and reinforcement delays.

Authors:  T A Shahan; K A Lattal
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Synthesizing concurrent interval performances.

Authors:  J S MacDonall
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 4.  Toward a unified theory of decision criterion learning in perceptual categorization.

Authors:  W Todd Maddox
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  What are we doing when we translate from quantitative models?

Authors:  Thomas S Critchfield; Derek D Reed
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  2009

6.  When we speak of integrating..

Authors:  T D Hackenberg
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  1987

7.  The dynamics of the law of effect: a comparison of models.

Authors:  Michael A Navakatikyan; Michael Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Concurrent VR VI schedules: primacy of molar control of preference and molecular control of response rates.

Authors:  Takayuki Tanno; Alan Silberberg; Takayuki Sakagami
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.986

9.  The matching relation and situation-specific bias modulation in professional football play selection.

Authors:  Stephanie T Stilling; Thomas S Critchfield
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Choice as a function of reinforcer "hold": from probability learning to concurrent reinforcement.

Authors:  Greg Jensen; Allen Neuringer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2008-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.