Literature DB >> 16812763

Within-session changes in key and lever pressing for water during several multiple variable-interval schedules.

F K McSweeney, J N Weatherly, S Swindell.   

Abstract

Rats pressed keys or levers for water reinforcers delivered by several multiple variable-interval schedules. The programmed rate of reinforcement varied from 15 to 240 reinforcers per hour in different conditions. Responding usually increased and then decreased within experimental sessions. As for food reinforcers, the within-session changes in both lever and key pressing were smaller, peaked later, and were more symmetrical around the middle of the session for lower than for higher rates of reinforcement. When schedules provided high rates of reinforcement, some quantitative differences appeared in the within-session changes for lever and key pressing and for food and water. These results imply that basically similar factors produce within-session changes in responding for lever and key pressing and for food and water. The nature of the reinforcer and the choice of response can also influence the quantitative properties of within-session changes at high rates of reinforcement. Finally, the results show that the application of Herrnstein's (1970) equation to rates of responding averaged over the session requires careful consideration.

Entities:  

Year:  1995        PMID: 16812763      PMCID: PMC1349839          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1995.64-75

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  7 in total

1.  PHYLETIC DIFFERENCES IN LEARNING.

Authors:  M E BITTERMAN
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  1965-06

2.  A progression for generating variable-interval schedules.

Authors:  M FLESHLER; H S HOFFMAN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1962-10       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Within-session changes in responding during several simple schedules.

Authors:  F K McSweeney; J M Roll; J N Weatherly
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  On the law of effect.

Authors:  R J Herrnstein
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-03       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Optimization and the matching law as accounts of instrumental behavior.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1981-11       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  A quantitative analysis of the responding maintained by interval schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  A C Catania; G S Reynolds
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-05       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 7.  Responding changes systematically within sessions during conditioning procedures.

Authors:  F K McSweeney; J M Roll
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 2.468

  7 in total
  5 in total

1.  Criticisms of the satiety hypothesis as an explanation for within-session decreases in responding.

Authors:  F K McSweeney; E S Murphy
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Within-session response rates when reinforcement rate is changed within each session.

Authors:  F K McSweeney; J N Weatherly; S Swindell
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Representing within-session response rates proportionally and entirely.

Authors:  D W Schaal
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Within-session changes in the VI response function: separating food density from elapsed session time.

Authors:  L S Campbell; J D Dougan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 5.  Habituation of reinforcer effectiveness.

Authors:  David R Lloyd; Douglas J Medina; Larry W Hawk; Whitney D Fosco; Jerry B Richards
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-09
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.