Literature DB >> 16812736

Within-session changes in responding during several simple schedules.

F K McSweeney, J M Roll, J N Weatherly.   

Abstract

Pigeons' key pecking was reinforced by food delivered by several fixed-interval, variable-ratio, and differential-reinforcement-of-low-rate schedules. Rate of responding, number of responses per reinforcer, length of postreinforcement pause, running response rate, and the time required to collect an available reinforcer changed systematically within sessions when the schedules provided high rates of reinforcement, but usually not when they provided low rates. These results suggest that the factors that produce within-session changes in responding are generally similar for different schedules of reinforcement. However, a separate factor may also contribute during variable-ratio schedules. The results question explanations for within-session changes that are related solely to the passage of time, to responding, and to one interpretation of attention. They support the idea that one or more factors related to reinforcement play a role.

Year:  1994        PMID: 16812736      PMCID: PMC1334370          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1994.62-109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  16 in total

1.  A progression for generating variable-interval schedules.

Authors:  M FLESHLER; H S HOFFMAN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1962-10       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Some properties of saccharin as a reinforcer.

Authors:  G COLLIER
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1962-08

3.  Consummatory and instrumental responding as functions of deprivation.

Authors:  G COLLIER
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1962-10

4.  The loci of reinforcement.

Authors:  G COLLIER; L MYERS
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1961-01

5.  Dynamics in the fine structure of schedule-controlled behavior.

Authors:  W L Palya
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Temporal control of behavior and the power law.

Authors:  C F Lowe; P Harzem; P T Spencer
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Time horizons in rats foraging for food in temporally separated patches.

Authors:  W Timberlake; D J Gawley; G A Lucas
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1987-07

8.  A quantitative analysis of the responding maintained by interval schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  A C Catania; G S Reynolds
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-05       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 9.  Responding changes systematically within sessions during conditioning procedures.

Authors:  F K McSweeney; J M Roll
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Attention and temporal discrimination: factors controlling responding under a cyclic-interval schedule.

Authors:  J E Staddon
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1967-07       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  12 in total

1.  Satiation, capacity, and within-session responding.

Authors:  T B DeMarse; P R Killeen; D Baker
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Behavioral economics and within-session changes in responding.

Authors:  F K McSweeney; S Swindell
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Criticisms of the satiety hypothesis as an explanation for within-session decreases in responding.

Authors:  F K McSweeney; E S Murphy
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Habituation contributes to within-session changes in free wheel running.

Authors:  K Aoyama; F K McSweeney
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  The effect of rate of reinforcement and time in session on preference for variability.

Authors:  Frances K McSweeney; Benjamin P Kowal; Eric S Murphy
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 1.986

Review 6.  Dynamic changes in reinforcer effectiveness: theoretical, methodological, and practical implications for applied research.

Authors:  Eric S Murphy; Frances K McSweeney; Richard G Smith; Jennifer J McComas
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2003

7.  Dynamic changes in reinforcer effectiveness: satiation and habituation have different implications for theory and practice.

Authors:  Frances K McSweeney
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  2004

8.  Within-session changes in key and lever pressing for water during several multiple variable-interval schedules.

Authors:  F K McSweeney; J N Weatherly; S Swindell
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Does satiation close the open economy?

Authors:  Diana Posadas-Sánchez; Peter R Killeen
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 1.986

Review 10.  Optimal response vigor and choice under non-stationary outcome values.

Authors:  Amir Dezfouli; Bernard W Balleine; Richard Nock
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.