Literature DB >> 16812754

Predicting and scaling hens' preferences for topographically different responses.

C E Sumpter, T M Foster, W Temple.   

Abstract

Six hens were exposed to several concurrent (second-order) variable-interval schedules in which the response requirements on the alternatives were varied. The response requirements were one key peck versus five key pecks, one key peck versus one door push, and five key pecks versus one door push. Response- and time-allocation ratios undermatched the obtained reinforcement ratios but were well described by the generalized matching law. Time and response bias estimates from two pairs of response requirements were used to predict bias in the third pairing. The predicted values were close to those obtained; this result supports the notion that both numerically and topographically different responses act as constant sources of bias within the generalized matching law. The differences between the response and time biases could be accounted for by the different times needed to complete each response requirement. The results also suggest that the door push is a useful operant for research with domestic hens.

Entities:  

Year:  1995        PMID: 16812754      PMCID: PMC1334393          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1995.63-151

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  17 in total

1.  The effects of different component response requirements in multiple and concurrent schedules.

Authors:  M Davison; A Ferguson
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  On two types of deviation from the matching law: bias and undermatching.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Undermatching: a reappraisal of performance on concurrent variable-interval schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  D L Myers; L E Myers
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Response and time allocation in concurrent second-order schedules.

Authors:  P G Beautrais; M C Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  The matching law.

Authors:  P Killeen
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-05       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Changeover delay and concurrent-schedule performance in domestic hens.

Authors:  W Temple; J M Scown; T M Foster
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Matching-based hedonic scaling in the pigeon.

Authors:  H L Miller
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Choice performance in several concurrent key-peck treadle-press reinforcement schedules.

Authors:  K L Wheatley; L A Engberg
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Concurrent schedule assessment of food preference in cows.

Authors:  L R Matthews; W Temple
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Locality fixation, mobility and social organization within an unconfined population of red jungle fowl.

Authors:  N E Collias; E C Collias; D Hunsaker; L Minning
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1966-10       Impact factor: 2.844

View more
  4 in total

1.  Comparing demand functions when different price manipulations are used: does unit price help?

Authors:  Catherine E Sumpter; William Temple; T Mary Foster
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 1.986

2.  Concurrent second-order schedules: some effects of variations in response number and duration.

Authors:  Diane M Sealey; Catherine E Sumpter; W Temple; T Mary Foster
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Concurrent schedules: Quantifying the aversiveness of noise.

Authors:  T M McAdie; T M Foster; W Temple
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Rimonabant's reductive effects on high densities of food reinforcement, but not palatability, in lean and obese Zucker rats.

Authors:  Jessica L Buckley; Erin B Rasmussen
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 4.530

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.