Literature DB >> 10605103

Behavioral economics and within-session changes in responding.

F K McSweeney1, S Swindell.   

Abstract

Pigeons and rats responded on fixed-ratio schedules with requirements ranging from 5 to 120 responses. Consistent with past results from several schedules and procedures, responding usually changed systematically within experimental sessions. The within-session changes were usually larger and were less symmetrical around the middle of the session for schedules that provided higher, rather than lower, rates of reinforcement. These results suggest that similar variables contribute to within-session changes in responding under different schedules. When an economic demand function was fit to the data, the intensity and elasticity of demand for food and the percentage of the variance accounted for decreased within sessions, although the trend for elasticity did not reach statistical significance for pigeons. These results suggest that relatively short sessions should be used to study economic demand in open economies and that demand may differ at different times in a session and in sessions of different lengths. Within-session changes in intensity, but not necessarily elasticity, of demand are consistent with behavioral economic theories.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10605103      PMCID: PMC1284744          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1999.72-355

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  8 in total

1.  HYPOTHALAMIC HYPERPHAGIA IN THE MONKEY.

Authors:  C L HAMILTON; J R BROBECK
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1964-04

2.  Within-session changes in responding during several simple schedules.

Authors:  F K McSweeney; J M Roll; J N Weatherly
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Behavioral economics.

Authors:  S R Hursh
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Within-session Changes In Responding During Autoshaping And Automaintenance Procedures.

Authors:  F McSweeney; S Swindell; J Weatherly
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Economic concepts for the analysis of behavior.

Authors:  S R Hursh
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  The application of the matching law to simple ratio schedules.

Authors:  W Timberlake
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  A cost-benefit analysis of demand for food.

Authors:  S R Hursh; T G Raslear; D Shurtleff; R Bauman; L Simmons
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  The post-reinforcement pause.

Authors:  M Felton; D O Lyon
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1966-03       Impact factor: 2.468

  8 in total
  10 in total

1.  Criticisms of the satiety hypothesis as an explanation for within-session decreases in responding.

Authors:  F K McSweeney; E S Murphy
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 2.  Dynamic changes in reinforcer effectiveness: theoretical, methodological, and practical implications for applied research.

Authors:  Eric S Murphy; Frances K McSweeney; Richard G Smith; Jennifer J McComas
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2003

3.  The relation of multiple-schedule behavioral contrast to deprivation, time in session, and within-session changes in responding.

Authors:  Frances K McSweeney; Samantha Swindell; Eric S Murphy; Benjamin P Kowal
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 1.986

4.  Dynamic changes in reinforcer effectiveness: satiation and habituation have different implications for theory and practice.

Authors:  Frances K McSweeney
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  2004

5.  The effects of session length on demand functions generated using FR schedules.

Authors:  T Mary Foster; Jennifer Kinloch; Alan Poling
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Can repetitive mental simulation of smoking engender habituation?

Authors:  Janet Audrain-McGovern; Andrew A Strasser; E Paul Wileyto
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 3.157

7.  What constitutes food variety? Stimulus specificity of food.

Authors:  Leonard H Epstein; Jodie L Robinson; James N Roemmich; Angela L Marusewski; Lora G Roba
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 3.868

8.  Habituation and within-session changes in motivated responding for food in children.

Authors:  Jennifer L Temple; April M Giacomelli; James N Roemmich; Leonard H Epstein
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2007-09-21       Impact factor: 3.868

9.  Effects of oral morphine on the larvae, pupae and imago development in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Elaheh Tekieh; Masoomeh Kazemi; Leila Dehghani; Sina Bahramyian; Mehrangiz Sadogi; Homeira Zardooz; Javad Fakhanik-Babaei; Hedayat Sahraei
Journal:  Cell J       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 2.479

10.  Prandial States Modify the Reactivity of the Gustatory Cortex Using Gustatory Evoked Potentials in Humans.

Authors:  Agnès Jacquin-Piques; Stéphanie Gaudillat; Thomas Mouillot; Vincent Gigot; Sophie Meillon; Corinne Leloup; Luc Penicaud; Laurent Brondel
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 4.677

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.