Literature DB >> 10605104

Satiation, capacity, and within-session responding.

T B DeMarse1, P R Killeen, D Baker.   

Abstract

Responding may change substantially over the course of a session (McSweeney, Hinson, & Cannon, 1996). The role of satiation in this effect was investigated in three experiments. Experiment 1 showed that the capacity of pigeons to consume milo over a 1-hr period was relatively stable across three different methods of measurement. In Experiment 2, pigeons were divided into two groups that differed in their capacity based on one of those measures. Key pecking was then reinforced under a variable-interval 30-s schedule with hopper durations of 2 or 5 s. According to the satiation hypothesis, subjects with small capacities should satiate faster and therefore show greater decreases in food-reinforced responding than would subjects with larger capacities. The results confirmed this prediction and showed that the magnitudes of within-session decreases were better predicted by the amount an animal consumed relative to its capacity than by absolute amount alone. In Experiment 3, each pigeon was prefed 0, 5, 15, or 25 g of milo prior to each session. Consistent with the satiation hypothesis, increases in prefeeding produced lower overall response rates in the smaller capacity subjects than in the larger capacity subjects at each level of prefeeding. These experiments demonstrate the importance of a new variable in the control of behavior, and provide a recommended technique for its measurement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10605104      PMCID: PMC1284745          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1999.72-407

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  5 in total

1.  Within-session changes in responding during several simple schedules.

Authors:  F K McSweeney; J M Roll; J N Weatherly
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Within-session Changes In Responding During Autoshaping And Automaintenance Procedures.

Authors:  F McSweeney; S Swindell; J Weatherly
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Economics, ecologics, and mechanics: The dynamics of responding under conditions of varying motivation.

Authors:  P R Killeen
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Satiation causes within-session decreases in instrumental responding.

Authors:  L A Bizo; S V Bogdanov; P R Killeen
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1998-10

5.  Animals respond for food in the presence of free food.

Authors:  A J Neuringer
Journal:  Science       Date:  1969-10-17       Impact factor: 47.728

  5 in total
  8 in total

1.  Criticisms of the satiety hypothesis as an explanation for within-session decreases in responding.

Authors:  F K McSweeney; E S Murphy
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  The relation of multiple-schedule behavioral contrast to deprivation, time in session, and within-session changes in responding.

Authors:  Frances K McSweeney; Samantha Swindell; Eric S Murphy; Benjamin P Kowal
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 1.986

3.  Dynamic changes in reinforcer effectiveness: satiation and habituation have different implications for theory and practice.

Authors:  Frances K McSweeney
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  2004

4.  Response variability in pigeons in a Pavlovian task.

Authors:  W David Stahlman; Michael E Young; Aaron P Blaisdell
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.986

5.  Seasonal variation in pigeon body weight and delayed matching-to-sample performance.

Authors:  Rebecca J Sargisson; Ian G McLean; Glenn S Brown; K Geoffrey White
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Habituation and within-session changes in motivated responding for food in children.

Authors:  Jennifer L Temple; April M Giacomelli; James N Roemmich; Leonard H Epstein
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2007-09-21       Impact factor: 3.868

7.  Escalation of food-maintained responding and sensitivity to the locomotor stimulant effects of cocaine in mice.

Authors:  James E Goeders; Kevin S Murnane; Matthew L Banks; William E Fantegrossi
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2009-04-17       Impact factor: 3.533

8.  Progressive ratio schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  Peter R Killeen; Diana Posadas-Sanchez; Espen Borgå Johansen; Eric A Thrailkill
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2009-01
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.