Literature DB >> 16573210

Does satiation close the open economy?

Diana Posadas-Sánchez1, Peter R Killeen.   

Abstract

Pigeons responded on fixed-interval and fixed-ratio food schedules during sessions of extended duration. Pause lengths from the beginning of the session, when the subjects were hungry, resembled those found in open economies, whereas pause lengths from the end of the sessions, when the subjects were close to satiation, resembled those from closed economies. A model of motivation captured key features of the data, suggesting that a changing level of hunger is a causal factor in the behavioral differences observed between open and closed economies. Behavioral theories may provide a parsimonious alternative to economic theories in accounting for such effects.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16573210      PMCID: PMC1456067          DOI: 10.3758/bf03193178

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Learn Behav        ISSN: 1543-4494            Impact factor:   1.986


  33 in total

1.  Within-session changes in responding during several simple schedules.

Authors:  F K McSweeney; J M Roll; J N Weatherly
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Variable-interval schedule performance in open and closed economies.

Authors:  G A Hall; K A Lattal
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  A two-state analysis of fixed-interval responding in the pigeon.

Authors:  B A Schneider
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-09       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Incentive theory: IV. Magnitude of reward.

Authors:  P R Killeen
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Temporal control of behavior and the power law.

Authors:  C F Lowe; P Harzem; P T Spencer
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Temporal control in fixed-interval schedules.

Authors:  M D Zeiler; D G Powell
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Reinforcement and substitution in humans: a multiple-response analysis.

Authors:  D J Bernstein; E B Ebbesen
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Who is in charge? Animal vs experimenter control.

Authors:  G Collier; D F Johnson
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 3.868

9.  The pattern of gastric emptying: a new view of old results.

Authors:  A Hopkins
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1966-01       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Within-session response rate in rats decreases as a function of amount eaten.

Authors:  K Aoyama
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1998-07
View more
  9 in total

1.  Effects of economy type and nicotine on the essential value of food in rats.

Authors:  Rachel N Cassidy; Jesse Dallery
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  The effects of session length on demand functions generated using FR schedules.

Authors:  T Mary Foster; Jennifer Kinloch; Alan Poling
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  The effect of economy type on heroin and saccharin essential value.

Authors:  Tommy Gunawan; Christopher S Tripoli; Alan Silberberg; David N Kearns
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 3.157

4.  Heroin choice depends on income level and economy type.

Authors:  Tommy Gunawan; Yosuke Hachiga; Christopher S Tripoli; Alan Silberberg; David N Kearns
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Effects of SKF-83566 and haloperidol on performance on progressive ratio schedules maintained by sucrose and corn oil reinforcement: quantitative analysis using a new model derived from the Mathematical Principles of Reinforcement (MPR).

Authors:  C M Olarte-Sánchez; L Valencia-Torres; H J Cassaday; C M Bradshaw; E Szabadi
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2013-07-05       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 6.  The effect of economy type on reinforcer value.

Authors:  David N Kearns
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 1.777

7.  Progressive ratio schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  Peter R Killeen; Diana Posadas-Sanchez; Espen Borgå Johansen; Eric A Thrailkill
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2009-01

8.  Effect of quinolinic acid-induced lesions of the subthalamic nucleus on performance on a progressive-ratio schedule of reinforcement: a quantitative analysis.

Authors:  G Bezzina; F S den Boon; C L Hampson; T H C Cheung; S Body; C M Bradshaw; E Szabadi; I M Anderson; J F W Deakin
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2008-09-18       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  The Risky Closed Economy: A Holistic, Longitudinal Approach to Studying Fear and Anxiety in Rodents.

Authors:  Bryan P Schuessler; Peter R Zambetti; Kisho M Kukuoka; Eun Joo Kim; Jeansok J Kim
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 3.558

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.