Literature DB >> 24879863

Visual control of an action discrimination in pigeons.

Muhammad A J Qadri1, Yael Asen1, Robert G Cook1.   

Abstract

Recognizing and categorizing behavior is essential for all animals. The visual and cognitive mechanisms underlying such action discriminations are not well understood, especially in nonhuman animals. To identify the visual bases of action discriminations, four pigeons were tested in a go/no-go procedure to examine the contribution of different visual features in a discrimination of walking and running actions by different digital animal models. Two different tests with point-light displays derived from studies of human biological motion failed to support transfer of the learned action discrimination from fully figured models. Tests with silhouettes, contours, and the selective deletion or occlusion of different parts of the models indicated that information about the global motions of the entire model was critical to the discrimination. This outcome, along with earlier results, suggests that the pigeons’ discrimination of these locomotive actions involved a generalized categorization of the sequence of configural poses. Because the motor systems for locomotion and flying in pigeons share little in common with quadruped motions, the pigeons’ discrimination of these behaviors creates problems for motor theories of action recognition based on mirror neurons or related notions of embodied cognition. It suggests instead that more general motion and shape mechanisms are sufficient for making such discriminations, at least in birds.
© 2014 ARVO.

Entities:  

Keywords:  action recognition; biological motion; global perception; occlusion; pigeon

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24879863      PMCID: PMC4144877          DOI: 10.1167/14.5.16

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  54 in total

1.  Effects of occlusion on pigeons' visual object recognition.

Authors:  Norma T DiPietro; Edward A Wasserman; Michael E Young
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 1.490

2.  Active versus passive processing of biological motion.

Authors:  Ian M Thornton; Ronald A Rensink; Maggie Shiffrar
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 1.490

3.  Discrimination and categorization of actions by pigeons.

Authors:  Yael Asen; Robert G Cook
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2012-04-26

Review 4.  Eight problems for the mirror neuron theory of action understanding in monkeys and humans.

Authors:  Gregory Hickok
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 5.  Embodied cognition and the simulation of action to understand others.

Authors:  Scott T Grafton
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 5.691

6.  Velocity-based motion categorization by pigeons.

Authors:  Robert G Cook; Kevin Beale; Angie Koban
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2011-04

7.  Perception of biological motion in common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus): by females only.

Authors:  J Brown; G Kaplan; L J Rogers; G Vallortigara
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 3.084

Review 8.  The visual perception of motion by observers with autism spectrum disorders: a review and synthesis.

Authors:  Martha D Kaiser; Maggie Shiffrar
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-10

9.  Categorization of birds, mammals, and chimeras by pigeons.

Authors:  Robert G Cook; Anthony A Wright; Eric E Drachman
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 1.777

10.  Learning to discriminate complex movements: biological versus artificial trajectories.

Authors:  Jan Jastorff; Zoe Kourtzi; Martin A Giese
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2006-07-14       Impact factor: 2.240

View more
  6 in total

1.  Experimental Divergences in the Visual Cognition of Birds and Mammals.

Authors:  Muhammad A J Qadri; Robert G Cook
Journal:  Comp Cogn Behav Rev       Date:  2015

2.  Complex conditional control by pigeons in a continuous virtual environment.

Authors:  Muhammad A J Qadri; Sean Reid; Robert G Cook
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Pigeons process actor-action configurations more readily than bystander-action configurations.

Authors:  Muhammad A J Qadri; Robert G Cook
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.986

4.  Discrimination of complex human behavior by pigeons (Columba livia) and humans.

Authors:  Muhammad A J Qadri; Justin M Sayde; Robert G Cook
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Pigeons integrate visual motion signals differently than humans.

Authors:  Yuya Hataji; Hika Kuroshima; Kazuo Fujita
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-09-16       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Dynamic Corridor Illusion in Pigeons: Humanlike Pictorial Cue Precedence Over Motion Parallax Cue in Size Perception.

Authors:  Yuya Hataji; Hika Kuroshima; Kazuo Fujita
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2020-03-24
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.