Literature DB >> 12507008

The structure of pigeon multiple-class same-different learning.

Robert G Cook1.   

Abstract

Three experiments examined the structure of the decision framework used by pigeons in learning a multiple-class same-different task. Using a same-different choice task requiring the discrimination of odd-item different displays (one or more of the display's component elements differed) from same displays (all display components identical), pigeons were concurrently trained with sets of four discriminable display types. In each experiment, the consistent group was tested such that the same and different displays of four display types were consistently mapped onto their choice alternatives. The inconsistent group received a conflicting mapping of the same and different displays and the choice alternatives that differed across the four display types but were consistent within a display type. Experiment 1 tested experienced pigeons, and Experiment 2 tested naive pigeons. In both experiments, the consistent group learned their discrimination faster and to a higher level of choice accuracy than did the inconsistent group, which performed poorly in general. Only in the consistent group was the discrimination transferred to novel stimuli, indicative of concept formation in that group. A third experiment documented that the different display classes were discriminable from one another. These results suggest that pigeons attempt to generate a single discriminative rule when learning this type of task, and that this general rule can cover a large variety of stimulus elements and organizations, consistent with previous evidence suggesting that pigeons may be capable of learning relatively unbounded relational same-different concepts.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12507008      PMCID: PMC1284904          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2002.78-345

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  8 in total

1.  COMPLEX VISUAL CONCEPT IN THE PIGEON.

Authors:  R J HERRNSTEIN; D H LOVELAND
Journal:  Science       Date:  1964-10-23       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Motion as a natural category for pigeons: Generalization and a feature-positive effect.

Authors:  W H Dittrich; S E Lea
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Discrimination of relative numerosity and stimulus mixture by pigeons with comparable tasks.

Authors:  W K Honig; W R Matheson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1995-10

4.  Pigeon same-different concept learning with multiple stimulus classes.

Authors:  R G Cook; J S Katz; B R Cavoto
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1997-10

5.  Same-different texture discrimination in pigeons: testing competing models of discrimination and stimulus integration.

Authors:  R G Cook; J T Wixted
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1997-10

6.  Entropy detection by pigeons: response to mixed visual displays after same-different discrimination training.

Authors:  M E Young; E A Wasserman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1997-04

7.  The randomization procedure in the study of categorization of multidimensional stimuli by pigeons.

Authors:  W T Herbranson; T Fremouw; C P Shimp
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1999-01

8.  A neuropsychological theory of multiple systems in category learning.

Authors:  F G Ashby; L A Alfonso-Reese; A U Turken; E M Waldron
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 8.934

  8 in total
  5 in total

1.  Two-item same-different concept learning in pigeons.

Authors:  Aaron P Blaisdell; Robert G Cook
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.986

2.  Transposition in pigeons: reassessing Spence (1937) with multiple discrimination training.

Authors:  Olga F Lazareva; Edward A Wasserman; Michael E Young
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.986

3.  Fading perceptual resemblance: a path for rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) to conceptual matching?

Authors:  J David Smith; Timothy M Flemming; Joseph Boomer; Michael J Beran; Barbara A Church
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2013-09-25

4.  Endpoint distinctiveness facilitates analogical mapping in pigeons.

Authors:  Carl Erick Hagmann; Robert G Cook
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 1.777

5.  Detection and discrimination of complex sounds by pigeons (Columba livia).

Authors:  Robert G Cook; Muhammad A J Qadri; Ryan Oliveira
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 1.777

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.