Literature DB >> 4194436

Apparent movement detection in the pigeon.

R K Siegel.   

Abstract

Pigeons were trained to discriminate between the presence and absence of apparent movement in visual displays. Generalization gradients obtained on the dimension of speed indicated a broad range of movement detection. Extremely accurate discrimination performance on displays varying in direction of movement suggested formation of a "movement concept".

Mesh:

Year:  1970        PMID: 4194436      PMCID: PMC1333704          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1970.14-93

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  5 in total

1.  COMPLEX VISUAL CONCEPT IN THE PIGEON.

Authors:  R J HERRNSTEIN; D H LOVELAND
Journal:  Science       Date:  1964-10-23       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  DIRECTIONAL MOVEMENT AND HORIZONTAL EDGE DETECTORS IN THE PIGEON RETINA.

Authors:  H R MATURANA; S FRENK
Journal:  Science       Date:  1963-11-15       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 3.  VISUAL APPARENT MOVEMENT RESEARCH: REVIEW, 1935-1955, AND BIBLIOGRAPHY, 1955-1963.

Authors:  L AARONS
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1964-02

4.  Pigeon concept formation: successive and simultaneous acquisition.

Authors:  R K Siegel; W K Honig
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-05       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Interhemispheric transfer of a discrimination of moving patterns in pigeon.

Authors:  N K Mello
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1968-03       Impact factor: 3.252

  5 in total
  6 in total

1.  Motion as a natural category for pigeons: Generalization and a feature-positive effect.

Authors:  W H Dittrich; S E Lea
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Pigeons' discrimination of Michotte's launching effect.

Authors:  Michael E Young; Joshua S Beckmann; Edward A Wasserman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Apparent movement and real movement detection in the pigeon: stimulus generalization.

Authors:  R K Siegel
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1971-09       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Stimulus control of the pigeon's ability to peck a moving target.

Authors:  R Pisacreta
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Limits of dynamic object perception in pigeons: dynamic stimulus presentation does not enhance perception and discrimination of complex shape.

Authors:  Michaela Loidolt; Ulrike Aust; Michael Steurer; Nikolaus F Troje; Ludwig Huber
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.986

6.  Tracking of unpredictable moving stimuli by pigeons.

Authors:  Anna Wilkinson; Kimberly Kirkpatrick
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.986

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.