Literature DB >> 16812675

Choice between repleting/depleting patches: A concurrent-schedule procedure.

M Davison.   

Abstract

Six pigeons responded on two concurrently available keys that defined patches with the following characteristics. Reinforcer stores repleted on a patch as a linear function of time when the bird had last responded to the other patch, or else did not replete. Repletion schedules thus timed only when the bird was absent from the patch. Reinforcer stores on a patch could be depleted and reinforcers obtained, again as a linear function of time, when the bird responded on a key. Depletion schedules thus timed only when the birds were present at a patch. Experiment 1 investigated changing relative depletion rates when repletion rates were constant and equal (Part 1) and changing relative repletion rates when the depletion rates were constant and equal (Part 2). Response- and time-allocation ratios conformed to a generalized matching relation with obtained reinforcer ratios, and there appeared to be no control by the size of the reinforcer stores. In Experiment 2, absolute depletion rates were varied with a pair of unequal repletion rates (Part 3), and absolute repletion rates were varied with a pair of unequal depletion rates (Part 4). Dwell times in the patches were not affected by either variation. Melioration theory predicted the results of Experiment 1 quite closely but erroneously predicted changing dwell times in Experiment 2. Molar maximization theory did not accurately predict the results of either experiment.

Year:  1992        PMID: 16812675      PMCID: PMC1322094          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1992.58-445

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  14 in total

1.  Maximizing and matching on concurrent ratio schedules.

Authors:  R J Herrnstein; D H Loveland
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1975-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Concurrent schedules: a quantitative relation between changeover behavior and its consequences.

Authors:  D A Stubbs; S S Pliskoff; H M Reid
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Sensitivity to reinforcement in concurrent arithmetic and exponential schedules.

Authors:  R Taylor; M Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Response rate and changeover performance on concurrent variable-interval schedules.

Authors:  I W Hunter; M C Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-05       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Choice: Effects of changeover schedules on concurrent performance.

Authors:  R D Tustin; M Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1979-07       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Melioration, matching, and maximization.

Authors:  W Vaughan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Performance in concurrent interval schedules: a systematic replication.

Authors:  B Lobb; M C Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1975-09       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  The matching law applies to wagtails' foraging in the wild.

Authors:  A Houston
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Concurrent-schedule performance: Effects of relative and overall reinforcer rate.

Authors:  B Alsop; D Elliffe
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Choice in free-ranging wild pigeons.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  Science       Date:  1974-07-05       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  1 in total

1.  Choice between constant and variable alternatives by rats: effects of different reinforcer amounts and energy budgets.

Authors:  M Ito; S Takatsuru; D Saeki
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.468

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.