Literature DB >> 16812236

Melioration, matching, and maximization.

W Vaughan.   

Abstract

Pigeons were studied in an experiment involving two concurrently available response keys. Conditions were such that in the first condition the predictions of melioration (Herrnstein & Vaughan, 1980), minimization of deviation from matching, and maximization were identical: relative time on the right key should have fallen between .125 and .25, which in fact occurred. In the second condition, melioration predicted a shift in relative time on the right to between .75 and .875, which would involve a transient deviation from matching as well as a substantial drop in rate of reinforcement. All three birds eventually shifted their distribution of behavior to within the range predicted by melioration.

Year:  1981        PMID: 16812236      PMCID: PMC1333063          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1981.36-141

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  8 in total

1.  Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement.

Authors:  R J HERRNSTEIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Maximizing and matching on concurrent ratio schedules.

Authors:  R J Herrnstein; D H Loveland
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1975-07       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  On two types of deviation from the matching law: bias and undermatching.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  On the law of effect.

Authors:  R J Herrnstein
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-03       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  A molar theory of reinforcement schedules.

Authors:  H Rachlin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Is matching compatible with reinforcement maximization on concurrent variable interval variable ratio?

Authors:  R J Herrnstein; G M Heyman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  The correlation-based law of effect.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-07       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Probabilistically reinforced choice behavior in pigeons.

Authors:  C P Shimp
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1966-07       Impact factor: 2.468

  8 in total
  48 in total

1.  Choice, changing over, and reinforcement delays.

Authors:  T A Shahan; K A Lattal
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Synthesizing concurrent interval performances.

Authors:  J S MacDonall
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Pigeon Lab notable experience.

Authors:  N H Azrin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Context matters: my education at the Harvard Pigeon Lab.

Authors:  Terry W Belke
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  The Harvard Pigeon Lab in context.

Authors:  Philip N Hineline
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  The Harvard Pigeon Lab, 1970-1998: graduate students and matching law research.

Authors:  Gene M Heyman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  A computational model of selection by consequences.

Authors:  J J McDowell
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Experimental design: Problems in understanding the dynamical behavior-environment system.

Authors:  M Davison
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  1998

Review 9.  The copyist model of response emission.

Authors:  Takayuki Tanno; Alan Silberberg
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-10

10.  The dynamics of the law of effect: a comparison of models.

Authors:  Michael A Navakatikyan; Michael Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.