Literature DB >> 16811858

Maximizing and matching on concurrent ratio schedules.

R J Herrnstein, D H Loveland.   

Abstract

Pigeons on concurrent variable-ratio variable-ratio schedules usually, though not always, maximize reinforcements per response. When the ratios are equal, maximization implies no particular distribution of responses to the two alternatives. When the ratios are unequal, maximization calls for exclusive preference for the smaller ratio. Responding conformed to these requirements for maximizing, which are further shown to be consistent with the conception of reinforcement implicit in the matching law governing relative responding in concurrent interval schedules.

Year:  1975        PMID: 16811858      PMCID: PMC1333386          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1975.24-107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  12 in total

1.  FURTHER EXPERIMENTS ON PROBABILITY-MATCHING IN THE PIGEON.

Authors:  V GRAF; D H BULLOCK; M E BITTERMAN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1964-03       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  A progression for generating variable-interval schedules.

Authors:  M FLESHLER; H S HOFFMAN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1962-10       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  On some determinants of choice in pigeons.

Authors:  G S REYNOLDS
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1963-01       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  The dependence of interresponse times upon the relative reinforcement of different interresponse times.

Authors:  D ANGER
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1956-09

5.  On the law of effect.

Authors:  R J Herrnstein
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-03       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Interval reinforcement of choice behavior in discrete trials.

Authors:  J A Nevin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-11       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  On the form of the relation between response rates in a multiple schedule.

Authors:  J A Nevin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-03       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Choice behavior on discrete trials: a demonstration of the occurrence of a response strategy.

Authors:  A Silberberg; D R Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-03       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Reinforcement of least-frequent sequences of choices.

Authors:  C P Shimp
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1967-01       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  A quantitative analysis of the responding maintained by interval schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  A C Catania; G S Reynolds
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-05       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  90 in total

1.  Drug discrimination under a concurrent fixed-ratio fixed-ratio schedule.

Authors:  D E McMillan; M Li
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Three predictions of the economic concept of unit price in a choice context.

Authors:  G J Madden; W K Bickel; E A Jacobs
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  An application of the matching law to evaluate the allocation of two- and three-point shots by college basketball players.

Authors:  T R Vollmer; J Bourret
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2000

4.  Drug discrimination under concurrent variable-ratio variable-ratio schedules.

Authors:  D E McMillan; W C Hardwick; Mi Li
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Base rates versus sample accuracy: competition for control in human matching to sample.

Authors:  A S Goodie; E Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  The living legacy of the Harvard Pigeon Lab: quantitative analysis in the wide world.

Authors:  A W Logue
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Progressing from programmatic to discovery research: a case example with the overjustification effect.

Authors:  Henry S Roane; Wayne W Fisher; Erin M McDonough
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2003

8.  Unit price and choice in a token-reinforcement context.

Authors:  Theresa A Foster; Timothy D Hackenberg
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 9.  The copyist model of response emission.

Authors:  Takayuki Tanno; Alan Silberberg
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-10

10.  The dynamics of the law of effect: a comparison of models.

Authors:  Michael A Navakatikyan; Michael Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.