Literature DB >> 16812441

The matching law applies to wagtails' foraging in the wild.

A Houston.   

Abstract

Field data concerning the time budgets and foraging success of pied wagtails (Motacilla alba yarrelli, Gould) are reanalyzed. It is found that the data are well described by the generalized matching law, with a marked bias towards spending time on the territory. In this case matching is not the result of maximizing reward rate, but it remains possible that it results from an allocation of time that maximizes survival.

Entities:  

Year:  1986        PMID: 16812441      PMCID: PMC1348207          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1986.45-15

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  8 in total

1.  Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement.

Authors:  R J HERRNSTEIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Choice as time allocation.

Authors:  W M Baum; H C Rachlin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-11       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  On two types of deviation from the matching law: bias and undermatching.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  On the law of effect.

Authors:  R J Herrnstein
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-03       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Concurrent variable-interval variable-ratio schedules can provide only weak evidence for matching.

Authors:  J M Ziriax; A Silberberg
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Is matching compatible with reinforcement maximization on concurrent variable interval variable ratio?

Authors:  R J Herrnstein; G M Heyman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Choice in free-ranging wild pigeons.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  Science       Date:  1974-07-05       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Matching, undermatching, and overmatching in studies of choice.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 2.468

  8 in total
  8 in total

1.  Are birds smarter than mathematicians? Pigeons (Columba livia) perform optimally on a version of the Monty Hall Dilemma.

Authors:  Walter T Herbranson; Julia Schroeder
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.231

2.  Choice between repleting/depleting patches: A concurrent-schedule procedure.

Authors:  M Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  The ecology of action selection: insights from artificial life.

Authors:  Anil K Seth
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2007-09-29       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Do we expect natural selection to produce rational behaviour?

Authors:  Alasdair I Houston; John M McNamara; Mark D Steer
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2007-09-29       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  The application of Herrnstein's law of effect to disruptive and on-task behavior of a retarded adolescent girl.

Authors:  B K Martens; J L Houk
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  More on concurrent interval-ratio schedules: a replication and review.

Authors:  G M Heyman; R J Herrnstein
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Matching in an undisturbed natural human environment.

Authors:  J J McDowell; Marcia L Caron
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  The dopamine circuit as a reward-taxis navigation system.

Authors:  Omer Karin; Uri Alon
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-07-25       Impact factor: 4.779

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.