Literature DB >> 16812145

Choice: Effects of changeover schedules on concurrent performance.

R D Tustin, M Davison.   

Abstract

The components of concurrent schedules were separated temporally by placing interval schedules on the changeover key. The rates of responding on both the main and changeover keys were examined as a function of the reinforcement rates. In the first experiment, the sensitivity of main-key performance to changing reinforcement rates was inversely related to the temporal separation of components, and changeover performance was monotonically related to the ratio of the reinforcement rates. In the second experiment, when the ratio of the reinforcement rates was scheduled to remain constant while the frequency of reinforcement was varied, changeover performance did not remain constant. A "sampling" interpretation of changeover responding was proposed and subsequently tested in a third experiment where extinction was always scheduled in one component and the frequency of reinforcement was varied in the second component. It was concluded that changeover performance can be interpreted using molar measures of reinforcement and that animals sample activities available to them at rates which are controlled by relative reinforcement rates.

Year:  1979        PMID: 16812145      PMCID: PMC1332881          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1979.32-75

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  23 in total

1.  Performance on variable-interval schedules arranged singly and concurrently.

Authors:  M C Davison; I W Hunter
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-05       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Concurrent schedules: a quantitative relation between changeover behavior and its consequences.

Authors:  D A Stubbs; S S Pliskoff; H M Reid
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Concurrent performances: inhibition of one response by reinforcement of another.

Authors:  A C Catania
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-09       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  On the law of effect.

Authors:  R J Herrnstein
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-03       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Concurrent responding with fixed relative rate of reinforcement.

Authors:  D A Stubbs; S S Pliskoff
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-11       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Undermatching: a reappraisal of performance on concurrent variable-interval schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  D L Myers; L E Myers
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Response rate and changeover performance on concurrent variable-interval schedules.

Authors:  I W Hunter; M C Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-05       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Aversive properties of the negative stimulus in a successive discrimination.

Authors:  M Rilling; H R Askew; J E Ahlskog; T J Kramer
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-11       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Superstitious key pecking after three peck-produced reinforcements.

Authors:  A J Neuringer
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-03       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Multiple schedule component duration: a reanalysis of Shimp and Wheatley (1971) and Todorov (1972).

Authors:  E L Edmon
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-09       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  7 in total

1.  Strict and random alternation in concurrent variable-interval schedules.

Authors:  Douglas Elliffe; Michael Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Sensitivity of time allocation to concurrent-schedule reinforcement.

Authors:  M Aldiss; M Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Choice between repleting/depleting patches: A concurrent-schedule procedure.

Authors:  M Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Assessing preference for reinforcers using demand curves, work-rate functions, and expansion paths.

Authors:  R D Tustin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Behavior-dependent reinforcer-rate changes in concurrent schedules: A further analysis.

Authors:  M Davison; B Alsop
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Choice, changeover, and travel: A quantitative model.

Authors:  M Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Momentary maximizing in concurrent schedules with a minimum interchangeover interval.

Authors:  J C Todorov; D G Souza; C M Bori
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 2.468

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.