Literature DB >> 16812617

Category discrimination by pigeons using five polymorphous features.

L Von Fersen, S E Lea.   

Abstract

Eight pigeons were trained to discriminate between sets of color photographs of natural scenes. The scenes differed along five two-valued dimensions (site, weather, camera distance, camera orientation, and camera height), and all combinations of the feature values were used. One value of each dimension was designated as positive, and slides containing three or more positive feature values were members of the positive stimulus set. Thus, each feature had an equal, low, correlation with reinforcement, and all features had zero correlations with each other. Seven of the 8 pigeons learned this discrimination, and their responding came under the control of all five features. Within the positive and negative stimulus sets, response rates were higher to stimuli that contained more positive feature values. Once discrimination had been achieved, reversal training was given using a subset of the slides. In this subset, only a single feature was correlated with reinforcement. All pigeons learned this reversal successfully and generalized it to additional photographs with the same feature content. After reversal, the original reinforcement contingencies were reinstated, and training was continued using all the slides except those that had been used in reversal. Reversal generalized to these slides to some extent. Analysis of the response rates to individual slides showed that, compared with prereversal training, only the feature that had been subjected to reversal contingencies showed a reversed correlation with response rate. The remaining features showed the same correlation with response rate as they had before reversal training. Thus, reversal on some members of a category following category discrimination training led to generalization to stimuli within the category that were not involved in the reversal, but not to features that were not reversed. It is therefore inappropriate to refer to the pigeons as learning a concept.

Year:  1990        PMID: 16812617      PMCID: PMC1322951          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1990.54-69

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  11 in total

1.  COMPLEX VISUAL CONCEPT IN THE PIGEON.

Authors:  R J HERRNSTEIN; D H LOVELAND
Journal:  Science       Date:  1964-10-23       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  The structure of equivalence classes.

Authors:  L Fields; T Verhave
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Pigeons can discriminate locations presented in pictures.

Authors:  W K Honig; K E Stewart
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Secondary generalization and categorization in pigeons.

Authors:  R S Bhatt; E A Wasserman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  High-order concept formation in the pigeon.

Authors:  R E Lubow
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-05       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Choosing among natural stimuli.

Authors:  W Vaughan; R J Herrnstein
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Natural concepts in pigeons.

Authors:  R J Hernstein; D H Loveland; C Cable
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1976-10

8.  Pigeons learn the concept of an "A".

Authors:  M J Morgan; M D Fitch; J G Holman; E G Lea
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1976       Impact factor: 1.490

Review 9.  A layered network model of associative learning: learning to learn and configuration.

Authors:  E J Kehoe
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 8.934

10.  Reading and auditory-visual equivalences.

Authors:  M Sidman
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1971-03
View more
  15 in total

1.  Recognition of static and dynamic images of depth-rotated human faces by pigeons.

Authors:  Masako Jitsumori; Hiroshi Makino
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 1.986

2.  Motion as a natural category for pigeons: Generalization and a feature-positive effect.

Authors:  W H Dittrich; S E Lea
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Formation of category representations.

Authors:  A J Wills; Malia Noury; Nicholas J Moberly; Matthew Newport
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-01

4.  The learning of basic-level categories by pigeons: the prototype effect, attention, and effects of categorization.

Authors:  Masako Jitsumori; Midori Ohkita; Tomokazu Ushitani
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.986

5.  Refining the visual-cortical hypothesis in category learning.

Authors:  Mariana V C Coutinho; Justin J Couchman; Joshua S Redford; J David Smith
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2010-08-01       Impact factor: 2.310

6.  Rules and resemblance: their changing balance in the category learning of humans (Homo sapiens) and monkeys (Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  Justin J Couchman; Mariana V C Coutinho; J David Smith
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2010-04

7.  Stages of category learning in monkeys (Macaca mulatta) and humans (Homo sapiens).

Authors:  J David Smith; William P Chapman; Joshua S Redford
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2010-01

Review 8.  Prototypes, exemplars, and the natural history of categorization.

Authors:  J David Smith
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-04

9.  Using the reassignment procedure to test object representation in pigeons and people.

Authors:  Jessie J Peissig; Yasuo Nagasaka; Michael E Young; Edward A Wasserman; Irving Biederman
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.986

Review 10.  Implicit and explicit categorization: a tale of four species.

Authors:  J David Smith; Mark E Berg; Robert G Cook; Matthew S Murphy; Matthew J Crossley; Joseph Boomer; Brian Spiering; Michael J Beran; Barbara A Church; F Gregory Ashby; Randolph C Grace
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2012-09-11       Impact factor: 8.989

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.