Literature DB >> 16686103

Formation of category representations.

A J Wills1, Malia Noury, Nicholas J Moberly, Matthew Newport.   

Abstract

Many formal models of categorization assume, implicitly or explicitly, that categorization results in the formation of direct associations from representations of the presented stimuli to representations of the experimentally provided category labels. In three categorization experiments employing a polymorphous classification structure (Dennis, Hampton, & Lea, 1973) and a partial reversal, optional shift procedure (Kendler, Kendler, & Wells, 1960), we provide evidence consistent with the hypothesis that learning a new classification problem results in the creation of category representations that mediate between representations of the stimulus and the label. This hypothesis can be instantiated through the AMBRY model (Kruschke, 1996).

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16686103     DOI: 10.3758/bf03193383

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  20 in total

1.  The sensitization and differentiation of dimensions during category learning.

Authors:  R L Goldstone; M Styvers
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2001-03

2.  Stability of functional equivalence and stimulus equivalence: effects of baseline reversals.

Authors:  Oliver Wirth; Philip N Chase
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 3.  Category use and category learning.

Authors:  Arthur B Markman; Brian H Ross
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 17.737

4.  Effects of mediated associations on transfer in paired-associate learning.

Authors:  K J NORCROSS; C C SPIKER
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1958-02

5.  Rigidity as a function of reversal and non-reversal shifts in the learning of successive discriminations.

Authors:  A H BUSS
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1953-02

6.  ALCOVE: an exemplar-based connectionist model of category learning.

Authors:  J K Kruschke
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Category discrimination by pigeons using five polymorphous features.

Authors:  L Von Fersen; S E Lea
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  An exemplar-based random walk model of speeded classification.

Authors:  R M Nosofsky; T J Palmeri
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  Conditional discrimination vs. matching to sample: an expansion of the testing paradigm.

Authors:  M Sidman; W Tailby
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Common coding in symbolic matching tasks with humans: training with a common consequence or antecedent.

Authors:  A R Delamater; P Joseph
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol B       Date:  2000-08
View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Human category learning 2.0.

Authors:  F Gregory Ashby; W Todd Maddox
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2010-12-23       Impact factor: 5.691

2.  A dimensional summation account of polymorphous category learning.

Authors:  Andy J Wills; Lyn Ellett; Fraser Milton; Gareth Croft; Tom Beesley
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.986

Review 3.  Multiple stages of learning in perceptual categorization: evidence and neurocomputational theory.

Authors:  George Cantwell; Matthew J Crossley; F Gregory Ashby
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-12

4.  Feature- versus rule-based generalization in rats, pigeons and humans.

Authors:  Elisa Maes; Guido De Filippo; Angus B Inkster; Stephen E G Lea; Jan De Houwer; Rudi D'Hooge; Tom Beckers; Andy J Wills
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2015-07-19       Impact factor: 3.084

5.  Category label and response location shifts in category learning.

Authors:  W Todd Maddox; Brian D Glass; Jeffrey B O'Brien; J Vincent Filoteo; F Gregory Ashby
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2009-05-27
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.