Literature DB >> 16812381

Shock intensity and signaled avoidance responding.

D Das Graças De Souza, A B Alves De Moraes, J C Todorov.   

Abstract

Five rats were submitted to a signaled free-operant avoidance contingency. Throughout the experiment, shock intensity was varied from 0.1 to 8.0 mA, with shock duration constant at 200 milleseconds. Results indicate: (a) an all-or-none effect of shock intensity on response and shock rates, on percentage of shocks avoided, and on frequency of occurrence of responding during the preshock stimulus; and (b) no systematic effect of shock intensity on stimulus control, measured either by the percentage of stimulus presentations accompanied by a response or by the percentage of responses that occurred during those preshock stimuli. Such results indicate that for each subject there is a minimum shock intensity necessary to establish and maintain avoidance responding; intensities higher than this minimum value have little or no effect on responding (with an upper limit for those strong intensities with a general disruptive effect on behavior).

Entities:  

Year:  1984        PMID: 16812381      PMCID: PMC1348045          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1984.42-67

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  18 in total

1.  Concurrent performances: a baseline for the study of reinforcement magnitude.

Authors:  A C CATANIA
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1963-04       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  STIMULUS CONTROL OF AVOIDANCE BEHAVIOR.

Authors:  R E ULRICH; W C HOLZ; N H AZRIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1964-03       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  The effect of shock intensity upon responding under a multiple-avoidance schedule.

Authors:  R W Powell
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-11       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Choice, relative reinforcer duration, and the changeover ratio.

Authors:  R M Dunn
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Signalled free-operant avoidance of shock by pigeons pecking a key.

Authors:  A B De Moraes; J C Todorov
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Reinforcer effectiveness as a function of reinforcer rate and magnitude: a comparison of concurrent performances.

Authors:  J W Schneider
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-11       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Choice for signalled over unsignalled shock as a function of shock intensity.

Authors:  J Harsh; P Badia
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1975-05       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Duration and rate of reinforcement as determinants of concurrent responding.

Authors:  J V Keller; L R Gollub
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-09       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Shock intensity and duration interactions on free-operant avoidance behavior.

Authors:  J D Leander
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-05       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Frequency versus magnitude of reinforcement: New data with a different procedure.

Authors:  J C Todorov; E S Hanna; M C Bittencourt De Sá
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  3 in total

1.  Negative effects of positive reinforcement.

Authors:  Michael Perone
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  2003

2.  Avoidance perseveration during extinction training in Wistar-Kyoto rats: an interaction of innate vulnerability and stressor intensity.

Authors:  Xilu Jiao; Kevin C H Pang; Kevin D Beck; Thomas R Minor; Richard J Servatius
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Effects of repeated exposure to escalating versus constant punishment intensity on response allocation.

Authors:  Rafaela M Fontes; Timothy A Shahan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 2.215

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.