Literature DB >> 16812021

Duration and rate of reinforcement as determinants of concurrent responding.

J V Keller, L R Gollub.   

Abstract

The duration and frequency of food presentation were varied in concurrent variable-interval variable-interval schedules of reinforcement. In the first experiment, in which pigeons were exposed to a succession of eight different schedules, neither relative duration nor relative frequency of reinforcement had as great an effect on response distribution as they have when they are manipulated separately. These results supported those previously reported by Todorov (1973) and Schneider (1973). In a second experiment, each of seven pigeons was exposed to only one concurrent schedule in which the frequency and/or duration of reinforcement differed on the two keys. Under these conditions, each pigeon's relative rate of response closely matched the relative total access to food that each schedule provided. This result suggests that previous failures to obtain matching may be due to factors such as an insufficient length of exposure to each schedule or to the pigeons' repeated exposure to different concurrent schedules.

Year:  1977        PMID: 16812021      PMCID: PMC1333626          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1977.28-145

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  13 in total

1.  Concurrent performances: a baseline for the study of reinforcement magnitude.

Authors:  A C CATANIA
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1963-04       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement.

Authors:  R J HERRNSTEIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-07       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Choice as time allocation.

Authors:  W M Baum; H C Rachlin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-11       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Preference and Switching under Concurrent Scheduling.

Authors:  J D Findley
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1958-04       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Effects of rate of reinforcement-time upon concurrent operant performance.

Authors:  R L Ten Eyck
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-11       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Reinforcer effectiveness as a function of reinforcer rate and magnitude: a comparison of concurrent performances.

Authors:  J W Schneider
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-11       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Choice, rate of reinforcement, and the changeover delay.

Authors:  A Silberberg; E Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-03       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Concurrent schedules of response-independent reinforcement: duration of a reinforcing stimulus.

Authors:  A J Brownstein
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1971-03       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Effects of reinforcement magnitude on choice and rate of responding.

Authors:  A J Neuringer
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1967-09       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Changeover delay and concurrent schedules: some effects on relative performance measures.

Authors:  R L Shull; S S Pliskoff
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1967-11       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  21 in total

1.  Concurrent schedules: reinforcer magnitude effects.

Authors:  Jason Landon; Michael Davison; Douglas Elliffe
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Forgetting the lessons of history.

Authors:  B A Wanchisen
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  1990

3.  Does sensitivity to magnitude depend on the temporal distribution of reinforcement?

Authors:  Randolph C Grace; Orn Bragason
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Shock intensity and signaled avoidance responding.

Authors:  D Das Graças De Souza; A B Alves De Moraes; J C Todorov
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Choice, relative reinforcer duration, and the changeover ratio.

Authors:  R M Dunn
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Preference for signaled versus unsignaled reinforcement delay in concurrent-chain schedules.

Authors:  A J Marcattilio; R W Richards
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Choice in a "self-control" paradigm: effects of a fading procedure.

Authors:  J E Mazur; A W Logue
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-07       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Concurrent variable-interval schedule performance: Fixed versus mixed reinforcer durations.

Authors:  M Davison; I Hogsden
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Choice in a self-control paradigm: Quantification of experience-based differences.

Authors:  A W Logue; M L Rodriguez; T E Peña-Correal; B C Mauro
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Matching, statistics, and common sense.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 2.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.