Literature DB >> 16812301

Topography of signal-centered behavior in the rat: Effects of deprivation state and reinforcer type.

G C Davey, G G Cleland.   

Abstract

In a series of three experiments, groups of food-deprived and water-deprived rats were given pairings of a retractable lever (CS(+)) with response-independent deliveries of either solid or liquid reinforcers. In Experiment 1 food-deprived rats given a solid-pellet reinforcer differentially tended to sniff, paw, mouth, and bite the CS(+) lever more often than a lever that was not paired with food (CS(-)), whereas food-deprived rats given a liquid reinforcer tended to differentially sniff, paw, and lick the CS(+) lever. 23(1/2)-hour water-deprived rats given liquid reinforcers showed very little CS(+) contact. In Experiment 2 increasing the severity of water deprivation from 23(1/2) to 47(1/2) hours significantly increased CS(+) contact. In Experiment 3, subjects that were simultaneously food and water deprived and given a water reinforcer failed to exhibit differential CS(+) contact, but subjects that were simultaneously food and water deprived and given a food reinforcer did acquire differential CS(+)-contact behavior. These results suggest that (a) even under a single motivational state the nature of signal-centered behavior can be determined by type of reinforcer, (b) although water reinforcement produces less signal contact than food reinforcement, this can be facilitated with more severe water-deprivation levels, and (c) high CS-contact rates using food reinforcement are not simply a product of reductions in body weight with food deprivation.

Entities:  

Year:  1982        PMID: 16812301      PMCID: PMC1347868          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1982.38-291

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  9 in total

1.  Bodyweight changes and behavioral attributes.

Authors:  R BOLLES; L PETRINOVICH
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1956-04

2.  Deprivation states and behavioral attributes.

Authors:  L PETRINOVICH; R BOLLES
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1954-12

3.  The associative relation underlying autoshaping in the pigeon.

Authors:  G Woodruff; D R Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-07       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Autoshaping in the rat: Effects of omission on the form of the response.

Authors:  G C Davey; D Oakley; G G Cleland
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 5.  Classical conditioning in animals.

Authors:  A Dickinson; N J Mackintosh
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  1978       Impact factor: 24.137

6.  The form of the auto-shaped response with food or water reinforcers.

Authors:  H M Jenkins; B R Moore
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-09       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Auto-shaping of the pigeon's key-peck.

Authors:  P L Brown; H M Jenkins
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-01       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Autoshaping in the rat with electrical stimulation of the brain as the US.

Authors:  D M Wilkie; A C McDonald
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1978-09

9.  Response selection properties of food and brain-stimulation reinforcers in rats.

Authors:  G B Peterson
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1975-06
  9 in total
  27 in total

Review 1.  Integration of reward signalling and appetite regulating peptide systems in the control of food-cue responses.

Authors:  A C Reichelt; R F Westbrook; M J Morris
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2015-11-01       Impact factor: 8.739

2.  Sign-tracking (autoshaping) in rats: a comparison of cocaine and food as unconditioned stimuli.

Authors:  David N Kearns; Stanley J Weiss
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 1.986

3.  A behavior systems view of the organization of multiple responses during a partially or continuously reinforced interfood clock.

Authors:  Kathleen M Silva; William Timberlake
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.986

Review 4.  Individual differences in the attribution of incentive salience to reward-related cues: Implications for addiction.

Authors:  Shelly B Flagel; Huda Akil; Terry E Robinson
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2008-06-21       Impact factor: 5.250

5.  Effects of reinforcing preselected approximations on the topography of the rat's bar press.

Authors:  P D Stokes; P D Balsam
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Autoshaping in the rat: The effects of localizable visual and auditory signals for food.

Authors:  G G Cleland; G C Davey
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Key-peck probability and topography in a concurrent variable-interval variable-interval schedule with food and water reinforcers.

Authors:  B O Ploog; H P Zeigler
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Chronic Stress Prevents Cortico-Accumbens Cue Encoding and Alters Conditioned Approach.

Authors:  Mitchell G Spring; Aaron Caccamise; Elizabeth A Panther; Bethany M Windsor; Karan R Soni; Jayme R McReynolds; Daniel S Wheeler; John R Mantsch; Robert A Wheeler
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-02-23       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 9.  Individual variation in resisting temptation: implications for addiction.

Authors:  Benjamin T Saunders; Terry E Robinson
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 8.989

10.  Which cue to "want?" Central amygdala opioid activation enhances and focuses incentive salience on a prepotent reward cue.

Authors:  Stephen V Mahler; Kent C Berridge
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-05-20       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.