Literature DB >> 33622777

Chronic Stress Prevents Cortico-Accumbens Cue Encoding and Alters Conditioned Approach.

Mitchell G Spring1, Aaron Caccamise1, Elizabeth A Panther1, Bethany M Windsor1, Karan R Soni1, Jayme R McReynolds1, Daniel S Wheeler1, John R Mantsch1, Robert A Wheeler2.   

Abstract

Chronic stress impairs the function of multiple brain regions and causes severe hedonic and motivational deficits. One brain region known to be susceptible to these effects is the PFC. Neurons in this region, specifically neuronal projections from the prelimbic region (PL) to the nucleus accumbens core (NAcC), have a significant role in promoting motivated approach. However, little is known about how activity in this pathway changes during associative learning to encode cues that promote approach. Less is known about how activity in this pathway may be altered by stress. In this study, an intersectional fiber photometry approach was used in male Sprague Dawley rats engaged in a Pavlovian autoshaping design to characterize the involvement of the PL-NAcC pathway in the typical acquisition of learned approach (directed at both the predictive cue and the goal), and its potential alteration by stress. Specifically, the hypothesis that neural activity in PL-NAcC would encode a Pavlovian approach cue and that prior exposure to chronic stress would disrupt both the nature of conditioned approach and the encoding of a cue that promotes approach was tested. Results of the study demonstrated that the rapid acquisition of conditioned approach was associated with cue-induced PL-NAcC activity. Prior stress both reduced cue-directed behavior and impaired the associated cortical activity. These findings demonstrate that prior stress diminishes the task-related activity of a brain pathway that regulates approach behavior. In addition, the results support the interpretation that stress disrupts reward processing by altering the incentive value of associated cues.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Chronic stress causes hedonic and motivational deficits and disrupts the function of the PFC. A specific projection from the prelimbic region of the PFC to the nucleus accumbens core (PL-NAcC) promotes approach behavior and is a strong candidate for contributing to stress-induced disruptions in motivation. However, it is not known how activity in this pathway encodes cues that promote approach, and how this encoding may be altered by stress. Here we show that the rapid acquisition of conditioned approach is associated with cue-induced activity in the PL-NAcC pathway. Prior stress both reduces cue-directed behavior and impairs the associated cortical activity. These findings demonstrate that stress diminishes task-related activity in a brain pathway that regulates approach behavior.
Copyright © 2021 the authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  approach; learning; motivation; prefrontal; reward; stress

Year:  2021        PMID: 33622777      PMCID: PMC7984602          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1869-20.2021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  28 in total

1.  In vivo imaging identifies temporal signature of D1 and D2 medium spiny neurons in cocaine reward.

Authors:  Erin S Calipari; Rosemary C Bagot; Immanuel Purushothaman; Thomas J Davidson; Jordan T Yorgason; Catherine J Peña; Deena M Walker; Stephen T Pirpinias; Kevin G Guise; Charu Ramakrishnan; Karl Deisseroth; Eric J Nestler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The role of glutamate signaling in incentive salience: second-by-second glutamate recordings in awake Sprague-Dawley rats.

Authors:  Seth R Batten; Francois Pomerleau; Jorge Quintero; Greg A Gerhardt; Joshua S Beckmann
Journal:  J Neurochem       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 5.372

3.  Dissociating the predictive and incentive motivational properties of reward-related cues through the study of individual differences.

Authors:  Terry E Robinson; Shelly B Flagel
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2008-10-18       Impact factor: 13.382

4.  Chronic stress causes frontostriatal reorganization and affects decision-making.

Authors:  Eduardo Dias-Ferreira; João C Sousa; Irene Melo; Pedro Morgado; Ana R Mesquita; João J Cerqueira; Rui M Costa; Nuno Sousa
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-07-31       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Cholinergic control over attention in rats prone to attribute incentive salience to reward cues.

Authors:  Giovanna Paolone; Christopher C Angelakos; Paul J Meyer; Terry E Robinson; Martin Sarter
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 6.  Presentation and Neurobiology of Anhedonia in Mood Disorders: Commonalities and Distinctions.

Authors:  Sakina J Rizvi; Clare Lambert; Sidney Kennedy
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 5.285

7.  Current perspectives on incentive salience and applications to clinical disorders.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Olney; Shelley M Warlow; Erin E Naffziger; Kent C Berridge
Journal:  Curr Opin Behav Sci       Date:  2018-01-30

8.  Single prolonged stress decreases sign-tracking and cue-induced reinstatement of cocaine-seeking.

Authors:  Christopher J Fitzpatrick; Lakshmikripa Jagannathan; Elijah D Lowenstein; Terry E Robinson; Jill B Becker; Jonathan D Morrow
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2018-08-02       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Prefrontal cortical circuit for depression- and anxiety-related behaviors mediated by cholecystokinin: role of ΔFosB.

Authors:  Vincent Vialou; Rosemary C Bagot; Michael E Cahill; Deveroux Ferguson; Alfred J Robison; David M Dietz; Barbara Fallon; Michelle Mazei-Robison; Stacy M Ku; Eileen Harrigan; Catherine A Winstanley; Tej Joshi; Jian Feng; Olivier Berton; Eric J Nestler
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Intact-Brain Analyses Reveal Distinct Information Carried by SNc Dopamine Subcircuits.

Authors:  Talia N Lerner; Carrie Shilyansky; Thomas J Davidson; Kathryn E Evans; Kevin T Beier; Kelly A Zalocusky; Ailey K Crow; Robert C Malenka; Liqun Luo; Raju Tomer; Karl Deisseroth
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 41.582

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.