Literature DB >> 19458221

Which cue to "want?" Central amygdala opioid activation enhances and focuses incentive salience on a prepotent reward cue.

Stephen V Mahler1, Kent C Berridge.   

Abstract

The central nucleus of the amygdala (CeA) helps translate learning into motivation, and here, we show that opioid stimulation of CeA magnifies and focuses learned incentive salience onto a specific reward cue (pavlovian conditioned stimulus, or CS). This motivation enhancement makes that cue more attractive, noticeable, and liable to elicit appetitive and consummatory behaviors. To reveal the focusing of incentive salience, we exploited individual differences in an autoshaping paradigm in which a rat prefers to approach, nibble, and sniff one of two reward-associated stimuli (its prepotent stimulus). The individually prepotent cue is either a predictive CS+ that signals reward (8 s metal lever insertion) or instead the metal cup that delivers sucrose pellets (the reward source). Results indicated that CeA opioid activation by microinjection of the mu agonist DAMGO (0.1 microg) selectively and reversibly enhanced the attractiveness of whichever reward CS was that rat's prepotent cue. CeA DAMGO microinjections made rats more vigorously approach their particular prepotent CS and to energetically sniff and nibble it in a nearly frenzied consummatory manner. Only the prepotent cue was enhanced as an incentive target, and alternative cues were not enhanced. Conversely, inactivation of CeA by muscimol microinjection (0.25 microg) suppressed approach, nibbles, and sniffs of the prepotent CS. Confirming modulation of incentive salience, unconditioned food intake was similarly increased by DAMGO microinjection and decreased by muscimol in CeA. We conclude that opioid neurotransmission in CeA helps determine which environmental stimuli become most "wanted," and how "wanted" they become. This may powerfully guide reward-seeking behavior.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19458221      PMCID: PMC2802210          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3875-08.2009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  76 in total

Review 1.  Functions of the amygdala and related forebrain areas in attention and cognition.

Authors:  M Gallagher; G Schoenbaum
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1999-06-29       Impact factor: 5.691

2.  Projections from the amygdaloid complex to the magnocellular cholinergic basal forebrain in rat.

Authors:  E Jolkkonen; R Miettinen; M Pikkarainen; A Pitkänen
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.590

3.  Striatal and central extended amygdala parts of the interstitial nucleus of the posterior limb of the anterior commissure: evidence from tract-tracing techniques in the rat.

Authors:  S J Shammah-Lagnado; G F Alheid; L Heimer
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2001-10-08       Impact factor: 3.215

4.  Fear and feeding in the nucleus accumbens shell: rostrocaudal segregation of GABA-elicited defensive behavior versus eating behavior.

Authors:  S M Reynolds; K C Berridge
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-05-01       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  The amygdala modulates memory consolidation of fear-motivated inhibitory avoidance learning but not classical fear conditioning.

Authors:  A E Wilensky; G E Schafe; J E LeDoux
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-09-15       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Dissociable effects of disconnecting amygdala central nucleus from the ventral tegmental area or substantia nigra on learned orienting and incentive motivation.

Authors:  Heather El-Amamy; Peter C Holland
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.386

Review 7.  Review. The incentive sensitization theory of addiction: some current issues.

Authors:  Terry E Robinson; Kent C Berridge
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-10-12       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Nucleus accumbens opioid, GABaergic, and dopaminergic modulation of palatable food motivation: contrasting effects revealed by a progressive ratio study in the rat.

Authors:  Min Zhang; Christian Balmadrid; Ann E Kelley
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 1.912

9.  A bi-directional mu-opioid-opioid connection between the nucleus of the accumbens shell and the central nucleus of the amygdala in the rat.

Authors:  Eun-Mee Kim; Joseph G Quinn; Allen S Levine; Eugene O'Hare
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2004-12-10       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 10.  Appetitive behavior: impact of amygdala-dependent mechanisms of emotional learning.

Authors:  Barry J Everitt; Rudolf N Cardinal; John A Parkinson; Trevor W Robbins
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 5.691

View more
  94 in total

1.  What and when to "want"? Amygdala-based focusing of incentive salience upon sugar and sex.

Authors:  Stephen V Mahler; Kent C Berridge
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Impact of COMT Val158Met-polymorphism on appetitive conditioning and amygdala/prefrontal effective connectivity.

Authors:  Tim Klucken; Onno Kruse; Sina Wehrum-Osinsky; Juergen Hennig; Jan Schweckendiek; Rudolf Stark
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Dopamine D2 receptors gate generalization of conditioned threat responses through mTORC1 signaling in the extended amygdala.

Authors:  D De Bundel; C Zussy; J Espallergues; C R Gerfen; J-A Girault; E Valjent
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 15.992

4.  Micro-opioid receptor activation in the basolateral amygdala mediates the learning of increases but not decreases in the incentive value of a food reward.

Authors:  Kate M Wassum; Ingrid C Cely; Bernard W Balleine; Nigel T Maidment
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 5.  'Liking' and 'wanting' food rewards: brain substrates and roles in eating disorders.

Authors:  Kent C Berridge
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2009-03-29

6.  Experimental predictions drawn from a computational model of sign-trackers and goal-trackers.

Authors:  Florian Lesaint; Olivier Sigaud; Jeremy J Clark; Shelly B Flagel; Mehdi Khamassi
Journal:  J Physiol Paris       Date:  2014-06-20

7.  Optogenetic excitation of central amygdala amplifies and narrows incentive motivation to pursue one reward above another.

Authors:  Mike J F Robinson; Shelley M Warlow; Kent C Berridge
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Dopamine or opioid stimulation of nucleus accumbens similarly amplify cue-triggered 'wanting' for reward: entire core and medial shell mapped as substrates for PIT enhancement.

Authors:  Susana Peciña; Kent C Berridge
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2013-03-17       Impact factor: 3.386

9.  Desire and dread from the nucleus accumbens: cortical glutamate and subcortical GABA differentially generate motivation and hedonic impact in the rat.

Authors:  Alexis Faure; Jocelyn M Richard; Kent C Berridge
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-06-18       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  A neural computational model of incentive salience.

Authors:  Jun Zhang; Kent C Berridge; Amy J Tindell; Kyle S Smith; J Wayne Aldridge
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2009-07-17       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.