Literature DB >> 4752087

The form of the auto-shaped response with food or water reinforcers.

H M Jenkins, B R Moore.   

Abstract

The relation between the form of auto-shaped responses to the lighting of a key and the consummatory responses of pecking grain and drinking water was examined in pigeons. Responses on the key were analyzed by means of high-speed photography, recordings of the force of contact, and judges' ratings of response-form based on film and videotape recordings. The first experiment showed that food-deprived birds presented grain as a reinforcer responded on the key with a grain-pecking movement, while water-deprived birds presented water as a reinforcer responded with drinking-like movements. The second and third experiments showed that the resemblance between auto-shaped and consummatory responses does not require the dominance of the deprivational state appropriate to the reinforcer. Changing the dominant state of deprivation did not immediately change the form of the key response, and in subjects simultaneously deprived of food and water, the form of response depended on the reinforcer. In the fourth and fifth experiments, subjects simultaneously deprived of food and water received one stimulus signalling food and another signalling water in a random series. In most subjects, the response to each stimulus resembled the consummatory response to the particular reinforcer that was signalled by the stimulus. This result demonstrates the role of association between a stimulus and a reinforcer in producing a resemblance of the auto-shaped response to the consummatory response.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1973        PMID: 4752087      PMCID: PMC1334117          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1973.20-163

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  9 in total

1.  Simple transducers to detect or record operant amplitude.

Authors:  R F HEFFERLINE; J D BIRCH; T GENTRY
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Autoshaping of key pecking in pigeons with negative reinforcement.

Authors:  H Rachlin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-07       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  A preliminary analysis of the dynamics of the pecking response in pigeons.

Authors:  M Rilling; T J Kramer; H R Askew
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-03       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Auto-maintenance in the pigeon: sustained pecking despite contingent non-reinforcement.

Authors:  D R Williams; H Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-07       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Auto-shaping in bobwhite quail.

Authors:  W M Gardner
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-03       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  A demonstration of auto-shaping with monkeys.

Authors:  M Sidman; F G Fletcher
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-05       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Probability of shock in the presence and absence of CS in fear conditioning.

Authors:  R A Rescorla
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1968-08

8.  Auto-shaping of the pigeon's key-peck.

Authors:  P L Brown; H M Jenkins
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-01       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Classical conditioning of a complex skeletal response.

Authors:  E Gamzu; D R Williams
Journal:  Science       Date:  1971-03-05       Impact factor: 47.728

  9 in total
  101 in total

1.  Effects of primary reinforcement on pigeons' initial-link responding under a concurrent chains schedule with nondifferntial terminal links.

Authors:  B O Ploog
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Drug effects on the performance of pigeons under a negative automaintenance schedule.

Authors:  A Poling; J B Appel
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1979-01-31       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  From molecular to molar: a paradigm shift in behavior analysis.

Authors:  William M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Selective sensitivity of schedule-induced activity to an operant suppression contingency.

Authors:  R W Allan; T J Matthews
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Can the experimental analysis of behavior rescue psychology?

Authors:  B F Skinner
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  1983

6.  The premack principle, response deprivation, and establishing operations.

Authors:  K P Klatt; E K Morris
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  2001

7.  Sign-tracking (autoshaping) in rats: a comparison of cocaine and food as unconditioned stimuli.

Authors:  David N Kearns; Stanley J Weiss
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 1.986

8.  Behavioral and associative effects of differential outcomes in discrimination learning.

Authors:  Peter J Urcuioli
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.986

Review 9.  The debate over dopamine's role in reward: the case for incentive salience.

Authors:  Kent C Berridge
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2006-10-27       Impact factor: 4.530

10.  Autoshaping the pigeon's gape response: acquisition and topography as a function of reinforcer type and magnitude.

Authors:  R W Allan; H P Zeigler
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 2.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.