Literature DB >> 16812275

Briefly delayed reinforcement: An interresponse time analysis.

K A Lattal, D R Ziegler.   

Abstract

Key-peck responding of pigeons was compared under VI or DRL schedules arranging immediate reinforcement and briefly (.5 sec) delayed reinforcement. Delays were either signaled by a blackout in the chamber, unsignaled, or unsignaled with an additional requirement that responding not occur during the .5 sec interval immediately preceding reinforcement (response delay). Relative to the immediate reinforcement condition, response rates increased during the unsignaled delay, decreased during the signaled delay, and were inconsistent during the response delay condition. An analysis of interresponse times (IRTs) under the different conditions revealed a substantial increase in the frequency of short (0 to .5 sec) IRTs during the unsignaled condition and generally during the response delay conditions compared to that during the immediate reinforcement baseline. Signaled delays decreased the frequency of short (0 to .5 sec) IRTs relative to the immediate reinforcement condition. The results suggest that brief unsignaled delays and, in many instances, response delays increase the frequency of short IRTs by eliminating constraints on responding.

Year:  1982        PMID: 16812275      PMCID: PMC1333156          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1982.37-407

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  11 in total

1.  EXTEROCEPTIVE CONTROL OF RESPONSE UNDER DELAYED REINFORCEMENT.

Authors:  R AZZI; D S FIX; F S KELLER; M I ROCHAESILVA
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1964-03       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  A progression for generating variable-interval schedules.

Authors:  M FLESHLER; H S HOFFMAN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1962-10       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  The dependence of interresponse times upon the relative reinforcement of different interresponse times.

Authors:  D ANGER
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1956-09

4.  Sustained behavior under delayed reinforcement.

Authors:  C B FERSTER
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1953-04

5.  A comparison of signaled and unsignaled delay of reinforcement.

Authors:  R W Richards
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Reinforcement schedules: the role of responses preceding the one that produces the reinforcer.

Authors:  A C Catania
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1971-05       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Unsignalled delay of reinforcement in variable-interval schedules.

Authors:  O J Sizemore; K A Lattal
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-09       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Studies on responding under fixed-interval schedules of reinforcement: the effects on the pattern of responding of changes in requirements at reinforcement.

Authors:  P B Dews
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-03       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Effects of a delay-reinforcement procedure on performance under IRT>t schedules.

Authors:  F A Gonzalez; R J Newlin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  The distribution of interresponse times in the pigeon during variable-interval reinforcement.

Authors:  P M Blough; D S Blough
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-01       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  8 in total

1.  Contingency and behavior analysis.

Authors:  K A Lattal
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  1995

Review 2.  Delayed reinforcement of operant behavior.

Authors:  Kennon A Lattal
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Unsignaled delay of reinforcement, relative time, and resistance to change.

Authors:  Timothy A Shahan; Kennon A Lattal
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Resistance to change of responding maintained by unsignaled delays to reinforcement: a response-bout analysis.

Authors:  Christopher A Podlesnik; Corina Jimenez-Gomez; Ryan D Ward; Timothy A Shahan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Changes in functional response units with briefly delayed reinforcement.

Authors:  J L Arbuckle; K A Lattal
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Mechanisms underlying the effects of unsignaled delayed reinforcement on key pecking of pigeons under variable-interval schedules.

Authors:  D W Schaal; T A Shahan; C A Kovera; M P Reilly
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Effects of delayed conditioned reinforcement in chain schedules.

Authors:  P Royalty; B A Williams; E Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Response-food delay gradients for lever pressing and schedule-induced licking in rats.

Authors:  Ricardo Pellón; Angeles Pérez-Padilla
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.986

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.