Literature DB >> 16812241

Preference for signaled versus unsignaled reinforcement delay in concurrent-chain schedules.

A J Marcattilio, R W Richards.   

Abstract

A concurrent-chain schedule was employed to examine pigeons' preferences for signaled versus unsignaled delay of reinforcement in which the delay durations ranged from zero to ten seconds. In general, pigeons preferred signaled delay over unsignaled delay especially when a variable-interval 30-second schedule operated in each initial link; when a variable-interval 90-second schedule operated in each initial link, these preferences tended toward indifference or were attenuated. In addition, prior training seemed to exert partial control over behavior. Responding in the terminal link was higher under signaled delay than unsignaled delay in a majority of the cases. Moreover, response rates under signaled delay remained fairly constant whereas responding under unsignaled delay was initially high, but decreased systematically with delay durations as short as 2.5 seconds. These results are consistent with a number of other studies demonstrating the significant role of a signal for impending positive stimuli.

Year:  1981        PMID: 16812241      PMCID: PMC1333069          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1981.36-221

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  23 in total

1.  Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement.

Authors:  R J HERRNSTEIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Free-operant behavior under conditions of delayed reinforcement. I. CRF-type schedules.

Authors:  P B DEWS
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1960-07       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Sustained behavior under delayed reinforcement.

Authors:  C B FERSTER
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1953-04

4.  Choice for periodic schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  B Duncan; E Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-07       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Choice and rate of reinforcement.

Authors:  E Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-09       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Choice and delay of reinforcement.

Authors:  S H Chung; R J Herrnstein
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1967-01       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Reinforcement delay: some effects on behavioral contrast.

Authors:  R W Richards
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-05       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  A quantitative analysis of the responding maintained by interval schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  A C Catania; G S Reynolds
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-05       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Effects of delayed reinforcement in a concurrent situation.

Authors:  S H Chung
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1965-11       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Concurrent schedules: undermatching and control by previous experimental conditions.

Authors:  M C Davison; I W Hunter
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  4 in total

1.  Preference for unsegmented interreinforcement intervals in concurrent chains.

Authors:  J P Leung; A S Winton
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Incentive theory: II. Models for choice.

Authors:  P R Killeen
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Handling time and choice in pigeons.

Authors:  S J Shettleworth
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Preference for less segmented fixed-time components in concurrent-chain schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  J P Leung; A S Winton
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 2.468

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.