Literature DB >> 16812429

Handling time and choice in pigeons.

S J Shettleworth.   

Abstract

According to optimal foraging theory, animals should prefer food items with the highest ratios of energy intake to handling time. When single items have negligible handling times, one large item should be preferred to a collection of small ones of equivalent total weight. However, when pigeons were offered such a choice on equal concurrent variable-interval schedules in a shuttlebox, they preferred the side offering many small items per reinforcement to that offering one or a few relatively large items. This preference was still evident on concurrent fixed-cumulative-duration schedules in which choosing the alternative with longer handling time substantially lowered the rate of food intake.

Year:  1985        PMID: 16812429      PMCID: PMC1348173          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1985.44-139

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  14 in total

1.  DECISION MAKING BY RATS: DELAY VERSUS AMOUNT OF REWARD.

Authors:  F A LOGAN
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1965-02

2.  A progression for generating variable-interval schedules.

Authors:  M FLESHLER; H S HOFFMAN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1962-10       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Amount of consummatory activity and performance in a modified T maze.

Authors:  R D HALL; J W KLING
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1960-04

4.  Choice as time allocation.

Authors:  W M Baum; H C Rachlin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-11       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Hill-climbing by pigeons.

Authors:  J M Hinson; J E Staddon
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Reinforcer effectiveness as a function of reinforcer rate and magnitude: a comparison of concurrent performances.

Authors:  J W Schneider
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-11       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Choice and delay of reinforcement.

Authors:  S H Chung; R J Herrnstein
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1967-01       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  A comparison of signaled and unsignaled delay of reinforcement.

Authors:  R W Richards
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Effects of delayed reinforcement in a concurrent situation.

Authors:  S H Chung
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1965-11       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Food preferences in the pigeon (Columba livia).

Authors:  R D Moon; H P Zeigler
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1979-06
View more
  4 in total

1.  Self-control in male and female rats.

Authors:  F Van Haaren; A Van Hest; N E Van De Poll
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  The rewarding effects of number and surface area of food in rats.

Authors:  Devina Wadhera; Lynn M Wilkie; Elizabeth D Capaldi-Phillips
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.986

3.  Scaling pigeons' choice of feeds: bigger is better.

Authors:  P R Killeen; H Cate; T Tran
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Memory and foraging theory: Chimpanzee utilization of optimality heuristics in the rank-order recovery of hidden foods.

Authors:  Ken Sayers; Charles R Menzel
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 2.844

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.