Literature DB >> 16811354

Effects of timeout on spaced responding in pigeons.

T J Kramer, M Rilling.   

Abstract

Three pigeons were trained under a differential-reinforcement-of-low-rate schedule of 20 sec, and then exposed to a schedule under which responses terminating interresponse times less than 20 sec produced timeout and responses terminating interresponse times greater than 20 sec produced reinforcement. Response-produced timeouts selectively decreased the probability of short interresponse times and thereby produced a higher frequency of reinforcement. The suppressive effect of timeout was independent of timeout duration, with timeouts of 5, 10, or 20 sec. Similar effects were found when the minimum interresponse time that could be terminated by response-produced reinforcement was increased to 30 sec. The suppressive effects of timeout on responding maintained by these schedules were similar to previous reports in which responding was punished with electric shock.

Year:  1969        PMID: 16811354      PMCID: PMC1338559          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-283

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  11 in total

1.  The role of temporal discriminations in the reinforcement of Sidman avoidance behavior.

Authors:  D ANGER
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1963-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  ACCURATE AND RAPID RECONDITIONING OF SPACED RESPONDING.

Authors:  G S REYNOLDS
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1964-05       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  TEMPORALLY SPACED RESPONDING BY PIGEONS: DEVELOPMENT AND EFFECTS OF DEPRIVATION AND EXTINCTION.

Authors:  G S REYNOLDS
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1964-11       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  A comparison of several procedures for eliminating behavior.

Authors:  W C HOLZ; N H AZRIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1963-07       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Punishment of temporally spaced responding.

Authors:  W C HOLZ; N H AZRIN; R E ULRICH
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1963-01       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  The dependence of interresponse times upon the relative reinforcement of different interresponse times.

Authors:  D ANGER
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1956-09

7.  On the selective reinforcement of spaced responses.

Authors:  M P WILSON; F S KELLER
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1953-06

8.  A comparison of the punishing effects of response-produced shock and response-produced time out.

Authors:  D E McMillan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1967-09       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 9.  Is time-out from positive reinforcement an aversive event? A review of the experimental evidence.

Authors:  H Leitenberg
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1965-12       Impact factor: 17.737

10.  Number of responses as a stimulus in fixed interval and fixed ratio schedules.

Authors:  M Rilling
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1967-02
View more
  4 in total

1.  Timeout as a punishing stimulus in continuous and intermittent schedules.

Authors:  H B Clark; T Rowbury; A M Baer; D M Baer
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1973

2.  A comparison of signaled and unsignaled delay of reinforcement.

Authors:  R W Richards
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Rats' lever-press durations as psychophysical judgements of time.

Authors:  J R Platt; D O Kuch; S C Bitgood
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-03       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Effects of lick-contingent timeout on schedule-induced polydipsia.

Authors:  R K Flory; G G Lickfett
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-01       Impact factor: 2.468

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.