Literature DB >> 16812057

Stimulus-reinforcer contingencies and local behavioral contrast.

B Schwartz.   

Abstract

Four pigeons were exposed to a series of multiple schedules of variable-interval reinforcement in which pecks were required on one key (operant key) and components were signalled on a second key (signal key). Four additional pigeons experienced identical conditions, except that a yoking procedure delivered food on variable-time schedules, with no key pecks required. One of the components of the multiple schedule was constant throughout the experiment as a variable-interval (or variable-time) 30-second schedule. Operant-key responding during the constant component was uniform throughout the component, uninfluenced by changes in the duration of the variable component, and only slightly influenced by changes in reinforcement frequency correlated with the variable component. By comparison, signal-key response rate during the constant component was highest at the onset of the component, was higher when the variable component was 60-sec long than when it was 1-sec long, and was higher when no reinforcement occurred in the variable component than when reinforcement was scheduled in the variable component. These characteristics of signal-key pecking matched characteristics of local positive behavioral contrast. These data are taken to support the "additivity theory" of behavioral contrast and to suggest that Pavlovian stimulus-reinforcer relations contribute primarily to the phenomenon of local positive contrast.

Year:  1978        PMID: 16812057      PMCID: PMC1332758          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1978.29-297

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  20 in total

1.  Work decrement and reminiscence in pigeon operant responding.

Authors:  C A BONEAU; S AXELROD
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1962-10

2.  Behavioral contrast.

Authors:  G S REYNOLDS
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-01       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Multiple fixed-interval schedules: transient contrast and temporal inhibition.

Authors:  J E Staddon
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-07       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  The maintenance of key pecking by stimulus-contingent and response-independent food presentation.

Authors:  E Gamzu; B Schwartz
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-01       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Matching to relative reinforcement frequency in multiple schedules with a short component duration.

Authors:  C P Shimp; K L Wheatley
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1971-03       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Associative factors underlying the pigeon's key pecking in auto-shaping procedures.

Authors:  E R Gamzu; D R Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-03       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Local contrast and Pavlovian induction.

Authors:  J C Malone
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Some tests of the additivity (autoshaping) theory of behavioral contrast.

Authors:  E Hearst; D Gormley
Journal:  Anim Learn Behav       Date:  1976-05

9.  Classical conditioning of a complex skeletal response.

Authors:  E Gamzu; D R Williams
Journal:  Science       Date:  1971-03-05       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  An analysis of contrast effects in multiple schedules.

Authors:  J A Nevin; S J Shettleworth
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1966-07       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  10 in total

1.  Three versions of the additive theories of behavioral contrast.

Authors:  F K McSweeney; R H Ettinger; W D Norman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Another look at contrast in multiple schedules.

Authors:  B A Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Real-time detection of orientation during negative behavioral contrast with key pecking and a turning response.

Authors:  K Manabe
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Determinants of contrast in the signal-key procedure: Evidence against additivity theory.

Authors:  B A Williams; N Heyneman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Fixed-ratio performance with and without a postreinforcement timeout.

Authors:  J E Mazur; M E Hyslop
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  The generalized matching law as a description of multiple-schedule responding.

Authors:  F K McSweeney; V A Farmer; J D Dougan; J E Whipple
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Some parameters of behavioral contrast and allocation of interim behavior in rats.

Authors:  J D Dougan; F K McSweeney; V A Farmer
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Local contrast in multiple schedules: the effect of stimulus discriminability.

Authors:  P M Blough
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Changeover delay effects on topographically tagged discriminative behavior.

Authors:  K G White
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Behavioral and dimensional contrast in rats.

Authors:  P M Blough
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1980-05       Impact factor: 2.468

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.