Literature DB >> 16811503

Matching to relative reinforcement frequency in multiple schedules with a short component duration.

C P Shimp, K L Wheatley.   

Abstract

Three pigeons performed on two-component multiple variable-interval variable-interval schedules of reinforcement. There were two independent variables: component duration and the relative frequency of reinforcement in a component. The component duration, which was always the same in both components, was varied over experimental conditions from 2 to 180 sec. Over these conditions, the relative frequency of reinforcement in a component was either 0.2 or 0.8 (+/-0.03). As the component duration was shortened, the relative frequency of responding in a component approached a value equal to the relative frequency of reinforcement in that component. When the relative frequency of reinforcement was varied over conditions in which the component duration was fixed at 5 sec, the relative frequency of responding in a component closely approximated the relative frequency of reinforcement in that component. That is, the familiar matching relationship, obtained previously only with concurrent schedules, was obtained in multiple schedules with a short component duration.

Year:  1971        PMID: 16811503      PMCID: PMC1333802          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1971.15-205

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  6 in total

1.  PROPERTIES OF BEHAVIOR UNDER RANDOM INTERVAL REINFORCEMENT SCHEDULES.

Authors:  J FARMER
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1963-10       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Some limitations on behavioral contrast and induction during successive discrimination.

Authors:  G S REYNOLDS
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1963-01       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement.

Authors:  R J HERRNSTEIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-07       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  On the law of effect.

Authors:  R J Herrnstein
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-03       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  A quantitative analysis of the responding maintained by interval schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  A C Catania; G S Reynolds
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-05       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Multiple schedules: effects of the distribution of reinforcements between component on the distribution of responses between conponents.

Authors:  D G Lander; R J Irwin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-09       Impact factor: 2.468

  6 in total
  58 in total

1.  Experimental design: Problems in understanding the dynamical behavior-environment system.

Authors:  M Davison
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  1998

2.  On the effects of component durations and component reinforcement rates in multiple schedules.

Authors:  L Charman; M Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  The effects of different component response requirements in multiple and concurrent schedules.

Authors:  M Davison; A Ferguson
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Elicited responding to signals for reinforcement: the effects of overall versus local changes in reinforcement probability.

Authors:  B A Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Another look at contrast in multiple schedules.

Authors:  B A Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Signalled and unsignalled percentage reinforcement of performance under a chained schedule.

Authors:  M N Branch
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  On two types of deviation from the matching law: bias and undermatching.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  A yoked-chamber comparison of concurrent and multiple schedules: the relationship between component duration and responding.

Authors:  A Silberberg; J Schrot
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Positive conditioned suppression: Transfer of performance between contingent and noncontingent reinforcement situations.

Authors:  M Davison; L Sheldon; B Lobb
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  The relative law of effect: effects of shock intensity on response strength in multiple schedules.

Authors:  A Bouzas
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 2.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.