Literature DB >> 16811958

Local contrast and Pavlovian induction.

J C Malone.   

Abstract

Two experiments examined the effects of number and similarity of stimuli on local contrast. In the first experiment, local contrast effects differed in magnitude as a function of the similarity among stimuli; greater positive local contrast appeared when stimuli were less similar, though this effect sometimes reversed for very dissimilar stimuli. In the second experiment, both positive and negative local contrast appeared transiently during the course of training a discrimination including two quite dissimilar stimuli. When two new stimuli were added, both effects reappeared in several cases. The effects remained when the discrimination was rendered more difficult by substituting a new stimulus very similar to one of the original pair. These and other data suggest that local contrast depends on the same factors that produce Pavlovian induction; in the absence of an alternative account, Pavlov's interpretation may be useful in suggesting further research that will help identify the mechanisms involved in both classical and operant discrimination learning.

Entities:  

Year:  1976        PMID: 16811958      PMCID: PMC1333533          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1976.26-425

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  8 in total

1.  RUSSIAN PHYSIOLOGISTS' PSYCHOLOGY AND AMERICAN EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY: A HISTORICAL AND A SYSTEMATIC COLLATION AND A LOOK INTO THE FUTURE.

Authors:  G RAZRAN
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1965-01       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  Work decrement and reminiscence in pigeon operant responding.

Authors:  C A BONEAU; S AXELROD
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1962-10

3.  Behavioral contrast.

Authors:  G S REYNOLDS
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-01       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  A re-examination of local contrast in multiple schedules.

Authors:  S L Buck; B Rothstein; B A Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Stimulus-specific contrast effects during operant discrimination learning.

Authors:  J C Malone
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Contrast effects in maintained generalization gradients.

Authors:  J C Malone; J E Staddon
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-01       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Behavioral contrast in the pigeon: a study of the duration of key pecking maintained on multiple schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  B Schwartz; B Hamilton; A Silberberg
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1975-09       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  An analysis of contrast effects in multiple schedules.

Authors:  J A Nevin; S J Shettleworth
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1966-07       Impact factor: 2.468

  8 in total
  13 in total

Review 1.  Behavioral contrast redux.

Authors:  Ben A Williams
Journal:  Anim Learn Behav       Date:  2002-02

2.  Three versions of the additive theories of behavioral contrast.

Authors:  F K McSweeney; R H Ettinger; W D Norman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Another look at contrast in multiple schedules.

Authors:  B A Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  The following schedule of reinforcement as a fundamental determinant of steady state contrast in multiple schedules.

Authors:  B A Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Undermatching and contrast within components of multiple schedules.

Authors:  A P McLean; K G White
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Local contrast in behavior allocation during multiple-schedule components.

Authors:  A P McLean
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Stimulus-reinforcer contingencies and local behavioral contrast.

Authors:  B Schwartz
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Fixed-ratio performance with and without a postreinforcement timeout.

Authors:  J E Mazur; M E Hyslop
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Effects of component length and of the transitions among components in multiple schedules.

Authors:  J M Hinson; J C Malone; K A McNally; D W Rowe
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Within-trial contrast: pigeons prefer conditioned reinforcers that follow a relatively more rather than a less aversive event.

Authors:  Thomas R Zentall; Rebecca A Singer
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 2.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.